From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
rafael@kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nicolas.pitre@linaro.org,
vincent.guittot@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [RFC V2 1/2] irq: Add a framework to measure interrupt timings
Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 21:20:14 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160120202014.GK6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1601202050050.3575@nanos>
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 08:57:06PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > Here too, ktime_get() is daft.
>
> What's the problem? ktime_xxx() itself or just the clock monotonic variant?
>
> On 99.9999% of the platforms ktime_get_mono_fast/raw_fast is not any slower
> than sched_clock(). The only case where sched_clock is faster is if your TSC
> is buggered and the box switches to HPET for timekeeping.
The HPET thing, I just don't want to have to explain why this is so much
more expensive on some random weird machine, esp. since it really
doesn't matter.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-20 20:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-06 15:22 [RFC PATCH 0/2] IRQ based next prediction Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-06 15:22 ` [RFC PATCH 1/2] irq: Add a framework to measure interrupt timings Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-08 15:31 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-12 11:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-06 15:22 ` [RFC PATCH 2/2] sched: idle: IRQ based next prediction for idle period Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-06 17:40 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-07 15:42 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-12 19:27 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-10 22:37 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-10 22:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-10 22:58 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-10 23:13 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-08 15:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-12 12:41 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-12 13:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-12 14:16 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-12 14:26 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-12 14:52 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-12 15:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-12 16:04 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-13 9:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-18 13:21 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 15:41 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-20 16:00 ` [RFC V2 0/2] IRQ based next prediction Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 16:00 ` [RFC V2 1/2] irq: Add a framework to measure interrupt timings Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 17:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-21 9:25 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-21 10:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-20 19:07 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 19:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-20 20:04 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-20 20:20 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2016-01-20 20:22 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-21 9:50 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-21 10:08 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 12:38 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-21 20:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-21 13:52 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-21 14:19 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-21 18:56 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-22 10:15 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 9:26 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 19:28 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 9:53 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 16:00 ` [RFC V2 2/2] sched: idle: IRQ based next prediction for idle period Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 17:46 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-20 18:44 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-21 10:03 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 19:02 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 19:17 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-20 19:29 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 19:34 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 19:40 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 19:57 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-20 20:22 ` Peter Zijlstra
2016-01-20 19:49 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-21 13:54 ` Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-21 14:12 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-01-20 16:00 ` [RFC V2 0/2] IRQ based next prediction Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 16:00 ` [RFC V2 1/2] irq: Add a framework to measure interrupt timings Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 16:00 ` [RFC V2 2/2] sched: idle: IRQ based next prediction for idle period Daniel Lezcano
2016-01-20 20:14 ` Nicolas Pitre
2016-01-21 13:04 ` Daniel Lezcano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160120202014.GK6356@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.pitre@linaro.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.