From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tom Rini Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 20:22:41 -0500 Subject: [U-Boot] [PATCH 1/2] checkpatch: ignore request to use ether_addr_copy() In-Reply-To: <569FF644.8040906@wwwdotorg.org> References: <1447430581-8805-1-git-send-email-swarren@wwwdotorg.org> <5670A37F.1020307@wwwdotorg.org> <56969621.30204@wwwdotorg.org> <569FF27B.5080606@wwwdotorg.org> <20160120210010.GZ3359@bill-the-cat> <569FF644.8040906@wwwdotorg.org> Message-ID: <20160121012241.GW3359@bill-the-cat> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: u-boot@lists.denx.de On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 02:04:04PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > On 01/20/2016 02:00 PM, Tom Rini wrote: > >On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 01:47:55PM -0700, Stephen Warren wrote: > >>On 01/13/2016 11:23 AM, Stephen Warren wrote: > >>>On 12/15/2015 04:41 PM, Joe Hershberger wrote: > >>>>Hi Stephen, > >>>> > >>>>On Tue, Dec 15, 2015 at 5:34 PM, Stephen Warren > >>>> wrote: > >>>>>On 11/23/2015 04:36 PM, Joe Hershberger wrote: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>On Fri, Nov 13, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Stephen Warren > >>>>>> > >>>>>>wrote: > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>From: Stephen Warren > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>The Linux kernel, from which checkpatch originates, contains function > >>>>>>>ether_addr_copy() to copy Ethernet MAC addresses, and checkpatch warns > >>>>>>>that it should be used in preference to memcpy() where appropriate. > >>>>>>>U-Boot doesn't contain ether_addr_copy(), so tell checkpatch not to > >>>>>>>issue > >>>>>>>this warning. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>Acked-by: Joe Hershberger > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>Were you intending someone else to apply this? I think now that Ted > >>>>>Chen has > >>>>>taken over the USB NIC driver (which was patch 2 in this series), > >>>>>this patch > >>>>>should be applied separately. > >>>> > >>>>It is assigned to Marek in patchwork. If he's not going to take it, > >>>>then assign it to me and I'll pull it in. > >>> > >>>Marek, > >>> > >>>Are you taking this patch? If not, could you please re-assign it to Joe; > >>>I don't believe I can modify patchwork myself. > >> > >>Marek? > >> > >>Tom, are you able to re-assign this patch to Joe in patchwork? > > > >Which? https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/570547/ ? > > Just patch 1/2 not 2/2: > > https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/544360/ > checkpatch: ignore request to use ether_addr_copy() Ah, ok. I've taken 1/2 but if Joe beats me to it (patchwork assignments are suggestions) that's fine too. -- Tom -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 836 bytes Desc: Digital signature URL: