From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wei Liu Subject: Re: [PATCH] public/io/netif.h: change semantics of "request-multicast-control" flag Date: Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:45:56 +0000 Message-ID: <20160121154556.GW1691@citrix.com> References: <1453294249-6346-1-git-send-email-paul.durrant@citrix.com> <1453390176.4320.47.camel@citrix.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail6.bemta5.messagelabs.com ([195.245.231.135]) by lists.xen.org with esmtp (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aMHQz-00076r-VJ for xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; Thu, 21 Jan 2016 15:46:06 +0000 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453390176.4320.47.camel@citrix.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org To: Ian Campbell Cc: Wei Liu , Keir Fraser , Tim Deegan , Ian Jackson , Paul Durrant , Jan Beulich , xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, Roger Pau Monne List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 03:29:36PM +0000, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Wed, 2016-01-20 at 12:50 +0000, Paul Durrant wrote: > > My patch b2700877 "move and amend multicast control documentation" > > clarified use of the multicast control protocol between frontend and > > backend. However, it transpires that the restrictions that documentation > > placed on the "request-multicast-control" flag make it hard for a > > frontend to enable 'all multicast' promiscuous mode, in that to do so > > would require the frontend and backend to disconnect and re-connect. > > > > This patch adds a new "feature-dynamic-multicast-control" flag to allow > > a backend to advertise that it will watch "request-multicast-control" hence > > allowing it to be meaningfully modified by the frontend at any time rather > > than only when the frontend and backend are disconnected. > > > > Signed-off-by: Paul Durrant > > Cc: Ian Campbell > > Cc: Ian Jackson > > Cc: Jan Beulich > > Cc: Keir Fraser > > Cc: Tim Deegan > > > This looks good to me, but also adding Wei (Linux netback + BSD stuff) and > Roger (BSD stuff) for their perspective. > > I should probably have done that for the last set of netif.h changes too, > since apart from the nominal maintainers of xen/include/public/io/*.h it's > worth getting input from the maintainers of the consumers. Not sure we can > express that very well in MAINTAINERS :-(. > > Ian. LGTM Acked-by: Wei Liu