From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pali =?utf-8?B?Um9ow6Fy?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] Common Dell SMBIOS API Date: Fri, 22 Jan 2016 15:48:51 +0100 Message-ID: <20160122144851.GN7192@pali> References: <1453472848-3118-1-git-send-email-kernel@kempniu.pl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453472848-3118-1-git-send-email-kernel@kempniu.pl> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?B?TWljaGHFgiBLxJlwaWXFhA==?= Cc: Darren Hart , Matthew Garrett , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org On Friday 22 January 2016 15:27:12 Micha=C5=82 K=C4=99pie=C5=84 wrote: > Note: >=20 > In this series (both v1 and v2) I tried to stick to the overall > concept used in dell-laptop, but in the v1 thread me and Pali als= o > briefly discussed his alternative ideas [1][2] as to what this AP= I > could look like, so feel free to suggest a different approach. >=20 > [1] http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg08260.html > [2] http://www.spinics.net/lists/platform-driver-x86/msg08268.html I would like to hear opinion about dell-smbios API also from other people. Darren, can you look and comment it? --=20 Pali Roh=C3=A1r pali.rohar@gmail.com