From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2016 19:24:58 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC 0/6] mmc: sdhi: add basic r8a7795 support
Message-Id: <20160125192457.GB1521@katana>
MIME-Version: 1
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="5I6of5zJg18YgZEa"
List-Id: <linux-sh.vger.kernel.org>
References: <1453220461-2598-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>
In-Reply-To: <1453220461-2598-1-git-send-email-wsa@the-dreams.de>
To: linux-sh@vger.kernel.org


--5I6of5zJg18YgZEa
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline


> I've been thinking about implementing a "delay callback", which waits for
> bit 13 on previous SoCs and for bit 14 for r8a7795.

Does it make a difference for you? I thought it didn't?


--5I6of5zJg18YgZEa
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1

iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJWpnaJAAoJEBQN5MwUoCm2S44P/08G3zz6myyfV/xXAkNtwe+u
F6mQbi3iFJsTRCCn8cITQ8ygZfT9WmzgQl2lUrIFmQHErYAAXV7EFq88X/Tw6cto
p7ntLyvVSEZ9nG/uWOa9ajun39mXpRzc/wfKko0oQMFOKHhf7XR3JKQz6FCSPGM/
EtwSMTEnTndvTc85XLz5zd5a5ofIrUN67zAMuMvFyTnp15t2W/Na7f16M6nBdP/x
vGR2+kawGFg+iky0uMwH9vy9jiHuIuNiXZA+cdwG5l9g9k0ma8WsnBxqO68ONPI4
Jt6TtWPM+GP6qG0vM/D45J3gAZh1/UCwCotasg0dpml4tSu+PiNekklIlIWnP8YF
FoleSVtHXq9TTl+jxdfPnI6od09KHJ2I6H9Yrd5GEO3/o96T4Cz8BDE/ZDpt2/KZ
DtHOWYSgNg1+/H7ZqAfeH5gTCD96mGnEbcNkZBV4WZPgi5ja+r5JrBgEGwyyHZ3C
y/lfTc2bovXrCeqPmww945BvZBBJM7Ft8MXnyaAWla3M4udl5d5C90H6ZdJ3wZ08
No8vKOlLcRFh1Gfw/f+OQ3DUBQysNTfP/V++Yp08QDX4Nn20i82tg4F0Tug9ARWy
jVfHum4AFiLOwdpQU7SKKB7s5zbrJ7Docw9rl9aZQ3hycPkUY69Mi4Xwd+zDt1+R
WS1lOK78sDCus+0lo+d/
=zOrX
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--5I6of5zJg18YgZEa--