From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35287) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aO2Nx-0002GB-5q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:06:18 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aO2Nt-0000FT-Un for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 07:06:13 -0500 Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 13:05:22 +0100 From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" Message-ID: <20160126120522.GA8630@toto> References: <1453456243-19879-1-git-send-email-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> <1453456243-19879-4-git-send-email-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/3] target-arm: Implement the S2 MMU inputsize > pamax check List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Edgar Iglesias , qemu-arm , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , QEMU Developers On Mon, Jan 25, 2016 at 12:57:41PM +0000, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 22 January 2016 at 09:50, Edgar E. Iglesias wrote: > > From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" > > > > Implement the inputsize > pamax check for Stage 2 translations. > > We have multiple choices for how to respond to errors and > > choose to fault. > > > > Signed-off-by: Edgar E. Iglesias > > --- > > target-arm/helper.c | 16 ++++++++++++---- > > 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > > > diff --git a/target-arm/helper.c b/target-arm/helper.c > > index 2a6fa94..8901762 100644 > > --- a/target-arm/helper.c > > +++ b/target-arm/helper.c > > @@ -6809,7 +6809,7 @@ static bool get_phys_addr_lpae(CPUARMState *env, target_ulong address, > > */ > > int startlevel = extract32(tcr->raw_tcr, 6, 2); > > unsigned int pamax = arm_pamax(cpu); > > - bool ok; > > + bool ok = true; > > > > if (va_size == 32 || stride == 9) { > > /* AArch32 or 4KB pages */ > > @@ -6819,9 +6819,17 @@ static bool get_phys_addr_lpae(CPUARMState *env, target_ulong address, > > level = 3 - startlevel; > > } > > > > - /* Check that the starting level is valid. */ > > - ok = check_s2_startlevel(cpu, va_size == 64, level, > > - inputsize, stride, pamax); > > + if (va_size == 64 && > > + inputsize > pamax && > > + (arm_el_is_aa64(env, 1) || inputsize > 40)) { > > + /* We have multiple choices but choose to fault. */ > > Can we say specifically "This is CONSTRAINED UNPREDICTABLE and > we choose...", please? I'll change this for v4. Thanks! Edgar