From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1753913AbcA0GgQ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 01:36:16 -0500
Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:33902 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1753624AbcA0GgO (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Wed, 27 Jan 2016 01:36:14 -0500
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 12:06:11 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
To: "Gautham R. Shenoy" <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
        Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        "Juri Lelli <Lelli" <juri.lelli@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND] cpufreq: Use list_is_last() to check last entry
 of the policy list
Message-ID: <20160127063611.GM3322@vireshk>
References: <1453715167-26165-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <1453876346-21869-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1453876346-21869-1-git-send-email-ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On 27-01-16, 12:02, Gautham R. Shenoy wrote:
> Currently next_policy() explicitly checks if a policy is the last
> policy in the cpufreq_policy_list. Use the standard list_is_last
> primitive instead.
> 
> Cc: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
> Signed-off-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> The earlier version one was based on an Juri's experimental branch. 
> I have based this one on linux-pm.git linux-next branch.
> 
>  drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> index c35e7da..e979ec7 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
> @@ -48,11 +48,11 @@ static struct cpufreq_policy *next_policy(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
>  					  bool active)
>  {
>  	do {
> -		policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
> -
>  		/* No more policies in the list */
> -		if (&policy->policy_list == &cpufreq_policy_list)
> +		if (list_is_last(&policy->policy_list, &cpufreq_policy_list))
>  			return NULL;
> +
> +		policy = list_next_entry(policy, policy_list);
>  	} while (!suitable_policy(policy, active));
>  
>  	return policy;

Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>

-- 
viresh