From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S966879AbcA0Tid (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:38:33 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:56219 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S966168AbcA0TQy (ORCPT ); Wed, 27 Jan 2016 14:16:54 -0500 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , stable@vger.kernel.org, Zi Shen Lim , Yang Shi , Xi Wang , Alexei Starovoitov , Catalin Marinas Subject: [PATCH 4.1 110/127] arm64: bpf: fix mod-by-zero case Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2016 10:14:34 -0800 Message-Id: <20160127180811.283389253@linuxfoundation.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.7.0 In-Reply-To: <20160127180805.624425994@linuxfoundation.org> References: <20160127180805.624425994@linuxfoundation.org> User-Agent: quilt/0.64 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org 4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Zi Shen Lim commit 14e589ff4aa3f28a5424e92b6495ecb8950080f7 upstream. Turns out in the case of modulo by zero in a BPF program: A = A % X; (X == 0) the expected behavior is to terminate with return value 0. The bug in JIT is exposed by a new test case [1]. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2015/11/4/499 Signed-off-by: Zi Shen Lim Reported-by: Yang Shi Reported-by: Xi Wang CC: Alexei Starovoitov Fixes: e54bcde3d69d ("arm64: eBPF JIT compiler") Signed-off-by: Catalin Marinas Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c | 21 +++++++++++++-------- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) --- a/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c +++ b/arch/arm64/net/bpf_jit_comp.c @@ -269,6 +269,8 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_i break; case BPF_ALU | BPF_DIV | BPF_X: case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_DIV | BPF_X: + case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X: + case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X: { const u8 r0 = bpf2a64[BPF_REG_0]; @@ -281,16 +283,19 @@ static int build_insn(const struct bpf_i check_imm26(jmp_offset); emit(A64_B(jmp_offset), ctx); /* else */ - emit(A64_UDIV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx); + switch (BPF_OP(code)) { + case BPF_DIV: + emit(A64_UDIV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx); + break; + case BPF_MOD: + ctx->tmp_used = 1; + emit(A64_UDIV(is64, tmp, dst, src), ctx); + emit(A64_MUL(is64, tmp, tmp, src), ctx); + emit(A64_SUB(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx); + break; + } break; } - case BPF_ALU | BPF_MOD | BPF_X: - case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_MOD | BPF_X: - ctx->tmp_used = 1; - emit(A64_UDIV(is64, tmp, dst, src), ctx); - emit(A64_MUL(is64, tmp, tmp, src), ctx); - emit(A64_SUB(is64, dst, dst, tmp), ctx); - break; case BPF_ALU | BPF_LSH | BPF_X: case BPF_ALU64 | BPF_LSH | BPF_X: emit(A64_LSLV(is64, dst, dst, src), ctx);