From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Jones Subject: Re: [PATCH v10 11/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMINTENSET and PMINTENCLR register Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 19:18:23 +0100 Message-ID: <20160128181823.GC16453@hawk.localdomain> References: <1453866709-20324-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> <1453866709-20324-12-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: kvmarm@lists.cs.columbia.edu, marc.zyngier@arm.com, christoffer.dall@linaro.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, kvm@vger.kernel.org, will.deacon@arm.com, wei@redhat.com, cov@codeaurora.org, shannon.zhao@linaro.org, peter.huangpeng@huawei.com, hangaohuai@huawei.com To: Shannon Zhao Return-path: Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59169 "EHLO mx1.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S964807AbcA1SSa (ORCPT ); Thu, 28 Jan 2016 13:18:30 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1453866709-20324-12-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:51:39AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: > From: Shannon Zhao > > Since the reset value of PMINTENSET and PMINTENCLR is UNKNOWN, use > reset_unknown for its reset handler. Add a handler to emulate writing > PMINTENSET or PMINTENCLR register. > > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > index d43a9a4..41d4bcd 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > @@ -630,6 +630,30 @@ static bool access_pmcnten(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p, > return true; > } > > +static bool access_pminten(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p, > + const struct sys_reg_desc *r) > +{ > + u64 mask = kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(vcpu); > + > + if (!kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(vcpu)) > + return trap_raz_wi(vcpu, p, r); > + > + if (p->is_write) { The two '& mask' line wrappings are kinda gross. How about doing u64 val = p->regval & mask; here, and then not needing to wrap? > + if (r->Op2 & 0x1) > + /* accessing PMINTENSET_EL1 */ > + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMINTENSET_EL1) |= (p->regval > + & mask); > + else > + /* accessing PMINTENCLR_EL1 */ > + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMINTENSET_EL1) &= ~(p->regval > + & mask); > + } else { > + p->regval = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMINTENSET_EL1) & mask; > + } > + > + return true; > +} > + > /* Silly macro to expand the DBG{BCR,BVR,WVR,WCR}n_EL1 registers in one go */ > #define DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR_EL1(n) \ > /* DBGBVRn_EL1 */ \ > @@ -788,10 +812,10 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = { > > /* PMINTENSET_EL1 */ > { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1110), Op2(0b001), > - trap_raz_wi }, > + access_pminten, reset_unknown, PMINTENSET_EL1 }, > /* PMINTENCLR_EL1 */ > { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1110), Op2(0b010), > - trap_raz_wi }, > + access_pminten, NULL, PMINTENSET_EL1 }, > > /* MAIR_EL1 */ > { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b1010), CRm(0b0010), Op2(0b000), > @@ -1186,8 +1210,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = { > { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(13), Op2( 1), access_pmu_evtyper }, > { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(13), Op2( 2), access_pmu_evcntr }, > { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 0), trap_raz_wi }, > - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 1), trap_raz_wi }, > - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi }, > + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 1), access_pminten }, > + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 2), access_pminten }, > > { Op1( 0), CRn(10), CRm( 2), Op2( 0), access_vm_reg, NULL, c10_PRRR }, > { Op1( 0), CRn(10), CRm( 2), Op2( 1), access_vm_reg, NULL, c10_NMRR }, > -- > 2.0.4 > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: drjones@redhat.com (Andrew Jones) Date: Thu, 28 Jan 2016 19:18:23 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v10 11/21] KVM: ARM64: Add access handler for PMINTENSET and PMINTENCLR register In-Reply-To: <1453866709-20324-12-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> References: <1453866709-20324-1-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> <1453866709-20324-12-git-send-email-zhaoshenglong@huawei.com> Message-ID: <20160128181823.GC16453@hawk.localdomain> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, Jan 27, 2016 at 11:51:39AM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote: > From: Shannon Zhao > > Since the reset value of PMINTENSET and PMINTENCLR is UNKNOWN, use > reset_unknown for its reset handler. Add a handler to emulate writing > PMINTENSET or PMINTENCLR register. > > Signed-off-by: Shannon Zhao > --- > arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---- > 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > index d43a9a4..41d4bcd 100644 > --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/sys_regs.c > @@ -630,6 +630,30 @@ static bool access_pmcnten(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p, > return true; > } > > +static bool access_pminten(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct sys_reg_params *p, > + const struct sys_reg_desc *r) > +{ > + u64 mask = kvm_pmu_valid_counter_mask(vcpu); > + > + if (!kvm_arm_pmu_v3_ready(vcpu)) > + return trap_raz_wi(vcpu, p, r); > + > + if (p->is_write) { The two '& mask' line wrappings are kinda gross. How about doing u64 val = p->regval & mask; here, and then not needing to wrap? > + if (r->Op2 & 0x1) > + /* accessing PMINTENSET_EL1 */ > + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMINTENSET_EL1) |= (p->regval > + & mask); > + else > + /* accessing PMINTENCLR_EL1 */ > + vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMINTENSET_EL1) &= ~(p->regval > + & mask); > + } else { > + p->regval = vcpu_sys_reg(vcpu, PMINTENSET_EL1) & mask; > + } > + > + return true; > +} > + > /* Silly macro to expand the DBG{BCR,BVR,WVR,WCR}n_EL1 registers in one go */ > #define DBG_BCR_BVR_WCR_WVR_EL1(n) \ > /* DBGBVRn_EL1 */ \ > @@ -788,10 +812,10 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc sys_reg_descs[] = { > > /* PMINTENSET_EL1 */ > { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1110), Op2(0b001), > - trap_raz_wi }, > + access_pminten, reset_unknown, PMINTENSET_EL1 }, > /* PMINTENCLR_EL1 */ > { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b1001), CRm(0b1110), Op2(0b010), > - trap_raz_wi }, > + access_pminten, NULL, PMINTENSET_EL1 }, > > /* MAIR_EL1 */ > { Op0(0b11), Op1(0b000), CRn(0b1010), CRm(0b0010), Op2(0b000), > @@ -1186,8 +1210,8 @@ static const struct sys_reg_desc cp15_regs[] = { > { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(13), Op2( 1), access_pmu_evtyper }, > { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(13), Op2( 2), access_pmu_evcntr }, > { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 0), trap_raz_wi }, > - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 1), trap_raz_wi }, > - { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 2), trap_raz_wi }, > + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 1), access_pminten }, > + { Op1( 0), CRn( 9), CRm(14), Op2( 2), access_pminten }, > > { Op1( 0), CRn(10), CRm( 2), Op2( 0), access_vm_reg, NULL, c10_PRRR }, > { Op1( 0), CRn(10), CRm( 2), Op2( 1), access_vm_reg, NULL, c10_NMRR }, > -- > 2.0.4 > > > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe kvm" in > the body of a message to majordomo at vger.kernel.org > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html