From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 00/18] Prerequisite patches for COLO
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 11:43:33 -0500
Message-ID: <20160129164333.GN22787@char.us.oracle.com>
References: <1454045254-3711-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org>
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1454045254-3711-1-git-send-email-wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Post: <mailto:xen-devel@lists.xen.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.xen.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel>,
	<mailto:xen-devel-request@lists.xen.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
Errors-To: xen-devel-bounces@lists.xen.org
To: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Lars Kurth <lars.kurth@citrix.com>, Changlong Xie <xiecl.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com>, Wei Liu <wei.liu2@citrix.com>, Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>, Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@citrix.com>, Jiang Yunhong <yunhong.jiang@intel.com>, Dong Eddie <eddie.dong@intel.com>, xen devel <xen-devel@lists.xen.org>, Gui Jianfeng <guijianfeng@cn.fujitsu.com>, Shriram Rajagopalan <rshriram@cs.ubc.ca>, Ian Jackson <ian.jackson@eu.citrix.com>, Yang Hongyang <hongyang.yang@easystack.cn>
List-Id: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 01:27:16PM +0800, Wen Congyang wrote:
> This patchset is Prerequisite for COLO feature. Refer to:
> http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/COLO_-_Coarse_Grain_Lock_Stepping
> 
> Patch status:
> 1. Acked patches: patch 2, 3, 4, 9, 10, 15, 16, 18
> 2. Reviewd patches: patch 1, 10, 13, 15, 16, 17, 18
> 3. New patches: none
> Note: patch 4 is updated to fix a bug
> 
> You can get the codes from here:
> https://github.com/wencongyang/xen/tree/colo_pre_v7

Fantastic!

It made it much easier to review. Thank you.

I've sent Reviewed-by on all the patches - and asked one patch:
"12/18] tools/libx{l,c}: add back channel to libxc"

to be modified a bit. I think it may cement the relationship
between the back_fd using the send_fd.

I am not the maintainer of libxl nor libxc so I cannot commit
it in. However it seems that some of the patches have an Ack
from Ian which means they could be committed in. But they
seem to be not-in order. Which means that

#1, #5-#8, #11, #12, #13-#14, #17 need an Ack from Ian's/Wei.

Hopefully my review will make it easier for them.