All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
To: Ross Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
	Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
	Dave Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.com>,
	Matthew Wilcox <willy@linux.intel.com>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] dax: fix bdev NULL pointer dereferences
Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2016 16:34:30 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160129233430.GA20549@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160129182815.GB5224@linux.intel.com>

On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 11:28:15AM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 01:38:58PM -0800, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 12:35:04PM -0700, Ross Zwisler wrote:
> > > There are a number of places in dax.c that look up the struct block_device
> > > associated with an inode.  Previously this was done by just using
> > > inode->i_sb->s_bdev.  This is correct for inodes that exist within the
> > > filesystems supported by DAX (ext2, ext4 & XFS), but when running DAX
> > > against raw block devices this value is NULL.  This causes NULL pointer
> > > dereferences when these block_device pointers are used.
> > 
> > It's also wrong for an XFS file system with a RT device..
> > 
> > > +#define DAX_BDEV(inode) (S_ISBLK(inode->i_mode) ? I_BDEV(inode) \
> > > +				: inode->i_sb->s_bdev)
> > 
> > .. but this isn't going to fix it.  You must use a bdev returned by
> > get_blocks or a similar file system method.
> 
> I guess I need to go off and understand if we can have DAX mappings on such a
> device.  If we can, we may have a problem - we can get the block_device from
> get_block() in I/O path and the various fault paths, but we don't have access
> to get_block() when flushing via dax_writeback_mapping_range().  We avoid
> needing it the normal case by storing the sector results from get_block() in
> the radix tree.
> 
> /me is off to play with RT devices...

Well, RT devices are completely broken as far as I can see.  I've reported the
breakage to the XFS list.  Anything I do that triggers a RT block allocation
in XFS causes a lockdep splat + a kernel BUG - I've tried regular pwrite(),
xfs_rtcp and mmap() + write to address.  Not a new bug either - happens just
the same with v4.4.  Happens with both PMEM and BRD, and has no relationship
to whether I'm using DAX or not.

Does it work for this patch to go in as-is since it fixes an immediate OOPS
with raw block devices + DAX, and when RT devices are alive again I'll figure
out how to make them work too?

  reply	other threads:[~2016-01-29 23:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-28 19:35 [PATCH 1/2] block: fix pfn_mkwrite() DAX fault handler Ross Zwisler
2016-01-28 19:35 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-28 19:35 ` [PATCH 2/2] dax: fix bdev NULL pointer dereferences Ross Zwisler
2016-01-28 19:35   ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-28 20:21   ` Dan Williams
2016-01-28 20:21     ` Dan Williams
2016-01-28 21:38   ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-01-29 18:28     ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-29 23:34       ` Ross Zwisler [this message]
2016-01-30  0:18         ` Dan Williams
2016-01-31 22:44         ` Dave Chinner
2016-01-30  5:28       ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-30  6:01         ` Dan Williams
2016-01-30  7:08           ` Jared Hulbert
2016-01-31  2:32           ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-31  6:12             ` Ross Zwisler
2016-01-31 10:55               ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-31 16:38                 ` Dan Williams
2016-01-31 18:07                   ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-31 18:18                     ` Dan Williams
2016-01-31 18:27                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-01-31 18:50                         ` Dan Williams
2016-01-31 19:51                     ` Dan Williams
2016-02-01 13:44             ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-01 14:51         ` Jan Kara
2016-02-01 20:49           ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-01 21:47           ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-02  6:06             ` Jared Hulbert
2016-02-02  6:46               ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02  8:05                 ` Jared Hulbert
2016-02-02 16:51                   ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 21:46                     ` Jared Hulbert
2016-02-03  0:34                       ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-03  1:21                         ` Jared Hulbert
2016-02-02 11:17             ` Jan Kara
2016-02-02 16:33               ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 16:46                 ` Jan Kara
2016-02-02 17:10                   ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 17:34                     ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 17:46                       ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 17:47                         ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 18:24                           ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 18:46                         ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-02 18:59                           ` Dan Williams
2016-02-02 20:14                             ` Matthew Wilcox
2016-02-03 11:09                           ` Jan Kara
2016-02-03 10:46                       ` Jan Kara
2016-02-03 20:13                         ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-04  9:15                           ` Jan Kara
2016-02-04 23:38                             ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-06 23:15                             ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-07  5:27                               ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-04 19:56                         ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-04 20:29                           ` Jan Kara
2016-02-04 22:19                             ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-05 22:25                             ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-06 23:40                               ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-07  6:43                                 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-08 13:48                                   ` Jan Kara
2016-02-07  8:38                               ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-02-08 15:55                                 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 18:41               ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02 18:53                 ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02  0:02     ` Ross Zwisler
2016-02-02  7:10       ` Dave Chinner
2016-02-02 10:34       ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160129233430.GA20549@linux.intel.com \
    --to=ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
    --cc=david@fromorbit.com \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org \
    --cc=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=willy@linux.intel.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.