From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933394AbcAaTUm (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jan 2016 14:20:42 -0500 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:59820 "EHLO mail.linuxfoundation.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933272AbcAaTUk (ORCPT ); Sun, 31 Jan 2016 14:20:40 -0500 Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2016 11:20:39 -0800 From: Greg Kroah-Hartman To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: Guenter Roeck , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Andrew Morton , shuah.kh@samsung.com, info@kernelci.org, "stable@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.1 000/127] 4.1.17-stable review Message-ID: <20160131192039.GC23698@kroah.com> References: <20160127180805.624425994@linuxfoundation.org> <56A9797E.6030600@roeck-us.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 09:17:10AM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > On 28 January 2016 at 03:14, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On 01/27/2016 10:12 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > >> > >> ------------------------- > >> NOTE: > >> There are still a lot of pending stable patches in the queue, well > >> over 400 of them to be specific, so some of your favorite/pet patches > >> might not be included in these releases. Please be patient as I dig > >> out from this backlog over the next few weeks. If there are specific > >> patches that you just _must_ have included in a stable release soon, > >> please let me know. > >> ------------------------- > >> > >> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.1.17 release. > >> There are 127 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response > >> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please > >> let me know. > >> > >> Responses should be made by Fri Jan 29 18:07:17 UTC 2016. > >> Anything received after that time might be too late. > >> > > > > Build results: > > total: 139 pass: 138 fail: 1 > > Failed builds: > > arm64:allmodconfig > > > > Qemu test results: > > total: 95 pass: 93 fail: 2 > > Failed tests: > > arm64:smp:defconfig > > arm64:nosmp:defconfig > > > > arm64:allmodconfig fails to build due to a crash in recordmcount, which > > is caused by 'recordmcount: arm64: Replace the ignored mcount call into > > nop'. > > That bug can be fixed by applying upstream commit c84da8b9ad37 > > ("recordmcount: > > Fix endianness handling bug for nop_mcount"). However, that does not help, > > because after applying this patch the build is then still broken due to > > 'arm64: mm: use correct mapping granularity under DEBUG_RODAT'. > > > > Apologies for not spotting that when the patches were sent out for > stable review. > 'arm64: mm: use correct mapping granularity under DEBUG_RODAT' needs a > special version for -stable which #defines SWAPPER_BLOCK_SIZE, since > that is a recent invention. > > I will follow up with a new patch, please disregard this version in > the mean time Ok, now dropped, thanks. greg k-h