From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751722AbcBAGDC (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 01:03:02 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f171.google.com ([209.85.192.171]:34670 "EHLO mail-pf0-f171.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750805AbcBAGC7 (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Feb 2016 01:02:59 -0500 Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 11:32:56 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Saravana Kannan Cc: Juri Lelli , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, rjw@rjwysocki.net, mturquette@baylibre.com, steve.muckle@linaro.org, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, morten.rasmussen@arm.com, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/19] cpufreq locking cleanups and documentation Message-ID: <20160201060256.GG13476@vireshk> References: <1452533760-13787-1-git-send-email-juri.lelli@arm.com> <56AC0A5E.1010505@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56AC0A5E.1010505@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 29-01-16, 16:57, Saravana Kannan wrote: > I haven't looked at the cpufreq-tests, but I doubt they do hotplug testing > where they remove all the CPUs of a policy (to trigger a policy exit). They do. -- viresh