From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S932765AbcBBO60 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:58:26 -0500
Received: from eddie.linux-mips.org ([148.251.95.138]:43580 "EHLO
	cvs.linux-mips.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S932490AbcBBO6Z (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 2 Feb 2016 09:58:25 -0500
Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2016 15:58:18 +0100
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?= <mans@mansr.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
        Paul McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
        Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>, Will Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@imgtec.com>,
        David Daney <ddaney@caviumnetworks.com>,
        James Hogan <james.hogan@imgtec.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] mips: Fix arch_spin_unlock()
Message-ID: <20160202145817.GB30875@linux-mips.org>
References: <20160129095958.GA4541@arm.com>
 <20160129102253.GG4503@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20160201135621.GD6828@arm.com>
 <20160202035458.GF6719@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <20160202051904.GC1239@fixme-laptop.cn.ibm.com>
 <20160202064433.GG6719@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
 <CA+55aFyrZZYKK4hsRX6GTuJ0vxJ6uyVgb2i8mMuMoKE4JoS+jQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CA+55aFwQ07x1ngSUEqqe7_6Kz2pY2+8rT5zamrQfubQhgHDKBw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160202144932.GA30875@linux-mips.org>
 <yw1xlh73i2nl.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
In-Reply-To: <yw1xlh73i2nl.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 02:54:06PM +0000, Måns Rullgård wrote:

> We don't really have much choice given the reality of existing hardware.

No, of course not - but I want us discourage new weakly ordered
platforms as much as possible.

  Ralf