From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1755673AbcBCEG5 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Tue, 2 Feb 2016 23:06:57 -0500
Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:36655 "EHLO
	ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1755468AbcBCEG4 (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Tue, 2 Feb 2016 23:06:56 -0500
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 04:02:39 +0000
From: Al Viro <viro@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
To: Kevin Easton <kevin@guarana.org>
Cc: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>, xypron.glpk@gmx.de,
        Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>, koct9i@gmail.com, ebiederm@xmission.com,
        Wei Tang <tangwei@cmss.chinamobile.com>, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        oleg@redhat.com, josh@joshtriplett.org, jason.low2@hp.com,
        peterz@infradead.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        akpm@linux-foundation.org, kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kernel/fork.c: use sizeof() instead of sizeof
Message-ID: <20160203040238.GS17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
References: <1454399594-14307-1-git-send-email-tangwei@cmss.chinamobile.com>
 <20160202091118.GB30393@gmail.com>
 <20160202154531.GO17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <CAOviyajXB2y5zuFhdRPQfVSe_NYvaFjjUz6f86e791AvFPYfMw@mail.gmail.com>
 <20160202170406.GP17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
 <20160203034607.GA4269@la.guarana.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160203034607.GA4269@la.guarana.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 10:46:07PM -0500, Kevin Easton wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 05:04:06PM +0000, Al Viro wrote:

> > the rules for ++ and -- might as well have been ++ postfix-expression and
> > -- postfix-expression resp.
> 
> Unless I'm mistaken, * cast-expression yields an lvalue.

D'oh...  Obviously correct (and just as obviously, ++*p is valid and quite
common).  Shouldn't have posted while half-asleep ;-/  Self-LART applied...