From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933440AbcBCG7W (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 01:59:22 -0500 Received: from mail-pf0-f173.google.com ([209.85.192.173]:36821 "EHLO mail-pf0-f173.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933229AbcBCG7U (ORCPT ); Wed, 3 Feb 2016 01:59:20 -0500 Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 12:29:17 +0530 From: Viresh Kumar To: Saravana Kannan Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Juri Lelli , Linux Kernel Mailing List , "linux-pm@vger.kernel.org" , Peter Zijlstra , Michael Turquette , Steve Muckle , Vincent Guittot , Morten Rasmussen , dietmar.eggemann@arm.com Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 11/19] cpufreq: assert policy->rwsem is held in __cpufreq_governor Message-ID: <20160203065917.GY31828@vireshk> References: <1703921.2AHaiQoggk@vostro.rjw.lan> <20160201060943.GH13476@vireshk> <56AFBEE5.70501@codeaurora.org> <20160202063449.GF31828@vireshk> <56B12191.8020407@codeaurora.org> <20160203021359.GL31828@vireshk> <56B17C56.1030504@codeaurora.org> <20160203050256.GQ31828@vireshk> <56B18ACB.5070704@codeaurora.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56B18ACB.5070704@codeaurora.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 02-02-16, 21:06, Saravana Kannan wrote: > I disagree. I think it's way better and simpler than this patch set. It also > doesn't tie into cpufreq_governor.* which is a good thing IMO since it keeps > things simpler for sched-dvfs too. Lets discuss it further on the other thread .. -- viresh