From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50496)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from
	<SRS0=yDE+=OC=ens-lyon.org=samuel.thibault@bounce.ens-lyon.org>)
	id 1aQtRk-0004xZ-TV
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 04:09:57 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from
	<SRS0=yDE+=OC=ens-lyon.org=samuel.thibault@bounce.ens-lyon.org>)
	id 1aQtRg-0002Gz-UZ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 04:09:56 -0500
Received: from sonata.ens-lyon.org ([140.77.166.138]:60749)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from
	<SRS0=yDE+=OC=ens-lyon.org=samuel.thibault@bounce.ens-lyon.org>)
	id 1aQtRg-0002Gu-NU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 04:09:52 -0500
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:09:49 +0100
From: Samuel Thibault <samuel.thibault@gnu.org>
Message-ID: <20160203090949.GB4666@var.home>
References: <1454380581-7881-1-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA_5mywtz-xvvxr0kLus_DdattHPV9Cc6spVE6E7+6qRhQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<56B18788.9050807@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <56B18788.9050807@redhat.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL 00/17] Net patches
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>, Thomas Huth <thuth@redhat.com>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, maethor@subiron.org

Jason Wang, on Wed 03 Feb 2016 12:52:24 +0800, wrote:
> > Hi. I'm afraid this failed to build on w32:
> >
> > declaration specifiers or =E2=80=98...=E2=80=99 before =E2=80=98sa_fa=
mily_t=E2=80=99
>=20
> - switch to use unsigned short
> - or typedef sa_family_t as unsigned short for windows

Doing the second runs the risk of windows eventually catching up with
what posix requires. Using unsigned short instead should be fine.

Samuel