From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1752597AbcBHMMt (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 07:12:49 -0500
Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:32894 "EHLO newverein.lst.de"
	rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S1751881AbcBHMMs (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 8 Feb 2016 07:12:48 -0500
Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 13:12:45 +0100
From: Torsten Duwe <duwe@lst.de>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
        Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@suse.cz>, Jessica Yu <jeyu@redhat.com>,
        linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
        live-patching@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 04/10] ppc64 ftrace_with_regs configuration variables
Message-ID: <20160208121245.GA921@lst.de>
References: <20160204161527.5F3AC692CD@newverein.lst.de> <20160204162053.C76A7692D8@newverein.lst.de> <20160205140517.GE3305@pathway.suse.cz> <20160205094803.1e0c6c91@gandalf.local.home> <20160205161834.GF731@pathway.suse.cz> <20160206103243.GB3130@lst.de> <20160208103406.GC30328@pathway.suse.cz>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160208103406.GC30328@pathway.suse.cz>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 11:34:06AM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Sat 2016-02-06 11:32:43, Torsten Duwe wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 05, 2016 at 05:18:34PM +0100, Petr Mladek wrote:
> > [...]
> > > more complicated. Whem I think about it, the change below does similar
> > > job and looks more strightforwad:
> > 
> > Had I only looked closer. That's exactly how I thought it would work
> > in the first place. I'd call that a fix. Full ACK from my side.
> 
> Feel free to merge this into your patch. Or do you want to do
> this in a separate one, please?

My Kconfig/Makefile changes depend on it, but OTOH this change (Fix!)
is independent.

IMHO the right thing would be you resend your second mail from Feb-05,
with your sign-off, my ack, FWIW, and Steven checks it in ;-)

	Torsten