From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752542AbcBHNKo (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 08:10:44 -0500 Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:24758 "EHLO mga04.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750814AbcBHNKm (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Feb 2016 08:10:42 -0500 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,416,1449561600"; d="scan'208";a="879469793" Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:44:19 +0530 From: Vinod Koul To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: Caesar Wang , Caesar Wang , Mark Rutland , devicetree@vger.kernel.org, Russell King , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, shawn.lin@rock-chips.com, dianders@chromium.org, Rob Herring , linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@lists.infradead.org, Mark Brown , Kumar Gala , dmaengine@vger.kernel.org, Dan Williams , Sonny Rao , linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Message-ID: <20160208131419.GA19598@localhost> References: <1453460812-8498-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com> <56AF01B6.6030204@gmail.com> <20160208031134.GI2531@localhost> <3817335.PXCk0JfYDT@phil> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3817335.PXCk0JfYDT@phil> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Heiko, On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:27:04AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 08:41:34 schrieb Vinod Koul: > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:56:54PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote: > > > Hello Vinod, > > > > > > Is there any chance apply the DMA patches?:-) > > > > I was waiting for any ACKs on ARM patches before I merge this series. > > I think the more regular way is for the driver maintainer to take the > driver-specific stuff and the devicetree parts going through the specific arm- > tree. But if you really want to take the whole series, for patches 4,5,6 Yes but that causes cross tree dependencies, which looking at this won't be a big problem, so I can safely merge dmaengine changes and rest can go thru ARM tree. Typically submitter should say which tree he/she prefers, which was not provided.. So, are all okay to merge the entire series thru dmaengine tree or independent. I don't mind either > - ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3288 platform > - ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3xxx platform > - ARM: dts: add pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3036 SoCs > > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner Thanks -- ~Vinod From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vinod Koul Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:44:19 +0530 Message-ID: <20160208131419.GA19598@localhost> References: <1453460812-8498-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com> <56AF01B6.6030204@gmail.com> <20160208031134.GI2531@localhost> <3817335.PXCk0JfYDT@phil> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3817335.PXCk0JfYDT@phil> Sender: devicetree-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Heiko Stuebner Cc: Caesar Wang , Caesar Wang , Mark Rutland , devicetree-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Russell King , Pawel Moll , Ian Campbell , linux-kernel-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, shawn.lin-TNX95d0MmH7DzftRWevZcw@public.gmane.org, dianders-F7+t8E8rja9g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org, Rob Herring , linux-spi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, linux-rockchip-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org, Mark Brown , Kumar Gala , dmaengine-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, Dan Williams , Sonny Rao , linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org Hi Heiko, On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:27:04AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 08:41:34 schrieb Vinod Koul: > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:56:54PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote: > > > Hello Vinod, > > > > > > Is there any chance apply the DMA patches?:-) > > > > I was waiting for any ACKs on ARM patches before I merge this series. > > I think the more regular way is for the driver maintainer to take the > driver-specific stuff and the devicetree parts going through the specific arm- > tree. But if you really want to take the whole series, for patches 4,5,6 Yes but that causes cross tree dependencies, which looking at this won't be a big problem, so I can safely merge dmaengine changes and rest can go thru ARM tree. Typically submitter should say which tree he/she prefers, which was not provided.. So, are all okay to merge the entire series thru dmaengine tree or independent. I don't mind either > - ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3288 platform > - ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3xxx platform > - ARM: dts: add pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3036 SoCs > > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner Thanks -- ~Vinod -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe devicetree" in the body of a message to majordomo-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: vinod.koul@intel.com (Vinod Koul) Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 18:44:19 +0530 Subject: [PATCH v7 0/9] Fix broken DMAFLUSHP on Rockchips platform In-Reply-To: <3817335.PXCk0JfYDT@phil> References: <1453460812-8498-1-git-send-email-wxt@rock-chips.com> <56AF01B6.6030204@gmail.com> <20160208031134.GI2531@localhost> <3817335.PXCk0JfYDT@phil> Message-ID: <20160208131419.GA19598@localhost> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org Hi Heiko, On Mon, Feb 08, 2016 at 10:27:04AM +0100, Heiko Stuebner wrote: > Hi Vinod, > > Am Montag, 8. Februar 2016, 08:41:34 schrieb Vinod Koul: > > On Mon, Feb 01, 2016 at 02:56:54PM +0800, Caesar Wang wrote: > > > Hello Vinod, > > > > > > Is there any chance apply the DMA patches?:-) > > > > I was waiting for any ACKs on ARM patches before I merge this series. > > I think the more regular way is for the driver maintainer to take the > driver-specific stuff and the devicetree parts going through the specific arm- > tree. But if you really want to take the whole series, for patches 4,5,6 Yes but that causes cross tree dependencies, which looking at this won't be a big problem, so I can safely merge dmaengine changes and rest can go thru ARM tree. Typically submitter should say which tree he/she prefers, which was not provided.. So, are all okay to merge the entire series thru dmaengine tree or independent. I don't mind either > - ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3288 platform > - ARM: dts: Add arm, pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3xxx platform > - ARM: dts: add pl330-broken-no-flushp quirk for rk3036 SoCs > > Acked-by: Heiko Stuebner Thanks -- ~Vinod