All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH 0/3] ACPI 6.1 NFIT Compatibility
@ 2016-02-08 18:30 ` Dan Williams
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2016-02-08 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, stable

The latest NFIT specification clarifies that a memory device will have a
control region table per function interface.  Without the fix in [PATCH
1/3] Linux will miscount the number of DIMMs and fail to load the
driver.  The fix is tagged for -stable on the expectation that ACPI 6.1
compatible systems will overlap current -stable development branches.

The latter two patches in the series are verification tests that can be
integrated for 4.6.

---

Dan Williams (3):
      nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility
      nfit, tools/testing/nvdimm: add format interface code definitions
      nfit, tools/testing/nvdimm: test multiple control regions per-dimm


 drivers/acpi/nfit.c              |   71 +++++++++++-----------
 drivers/acpi/nfit.h              |    6 ++
 tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c |  125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 0/3] ACPI 6.1 NFIT Compatibility
@ 2016-02-08 18:30 ` Dan Williams
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2016-02-08 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, stable

The latest NFIT specification clarifies that a memory device will have a
control region table per function interface.  Without the fix in [PATCH
1/3] Linux will miscount the number of DIMMs and fail to load the
driver.  The fix is tagged for -stable on the expectation that ACPI 6.1
compatible systems will overlap current -stable development branches.

The latter two patches in the series are verification tests that can be
integrated for 4.6.

---

Dan Williams (3):
      nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility
      nfit, tools/testing/nvdimm: add format interface code definitions
      nfit, tools/testing/nvdimm: test multiple control regions per-dimm


 drivers/acpi/nfit.c              |   71 +++++++++++-----------
 drivers/acpi/nfit.h              |    6 ++
 tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c |  125 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 3 files changed, 141 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/3] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility
  2016-02-08 18:30 ` Dan Williams
@ 2016-02-08 18:30   ` Dan Williams
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2016-02-08 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, stable

ACPI 6.1 clarified that multi-interface dimms require multiple control
region entries (DCRs) per dimm.  Previously we were assuming that a
control region is only present when block-data-windows are present.
This implementation was done with an eye to be compatibility with the
looser ACPI 6.0 interpretation of this table.

1/ When coalescing the memory device (MEMDEV) tables for a single dimm,
coalesce on device_handle rather than control region index.

2/ Whenever we disocver a control region with non-zero block windows
re-scan for block-data-window (BDW) entries.

We may need to revisit this if a DIMM ever implements a format interface
outside of blk or pmem, but that is not on the foreseeable horizon.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/nfit.c |   71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
index ad6d8c6b777e..424b362e8fdc 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
@@ -469,37 +469,16 @@ static void nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 	nfit_mem->bdw = NULL;
 }
 
-static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
+static void nfit_mem_init_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 		struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, struct acpi_nfit_system_address *spa)
 {
 	u16 dcr = __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index;
 	struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
 	struct nfit_flush *nfit_flush;
-	struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
 	struct nfit_bdw *nfit_bdw;
 	struct nfit_idt *nfit_idt;
 	u16 idt_idx, range_index;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
-		if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
-			continue;
-		nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
-		break;
-	}
-
-	if (!nfit_mem->dcr) {
-		dev_dbg(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing:%s%s\n",
-				spa->range_index, __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)
-				? "" : " MEMDEV", nfit_mem->dcr ? "" : " DCR");
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * We've found enough to create an nvdimm, optionally
-	 * find an associated BDW
-	 */
-	list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
-
 	list_for_each_entry(nfit_bdw, &acpi_desc->bdws, list) {
 		if (nfit_bdw->bdw->region_index != dcr)
 			continue;
@@ -508,12 +487,12 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 	}
 
 	if (!nfit_mem->bdw)
-		return 0;
+		return;
 
 	nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem);
 
 	if (!nfit_mem->spa_bdw)
-		return 0;
+		return;
 
 	range_index = nfit_mem->spa_bdw->range_index;
 	list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
@@ -538,8 +517,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 		}
 		break;
 	}
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
@@ -548,7 +525,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 	struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, *found;
 	struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
 	int type = nfit_spa_type(spa);
-	u16 dcr;
 
 	switch (type) {
 	case NFIT_SPA_DCR:
@@ -559,14 +535,18 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 	}
 
 	list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
-		int rc;
+		struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
+		u32 device_handle;
+		u16 dcr;
 
 		if (nfit_memdev->memdev->range_index != spa->range_index)
 			continue;
 		found = NULL;
 		dcr = nfit_memdev->memdev->region_index;
+		device_handle = nfit_memdev->memdev->device_handle;
 		list_for_each_entry(nfit_mem, &acpi_desc->dimms, list)
-			if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index == dcr) {
+			if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->device_handle
+					== device_handle) {
 				found = nfit_mem;
 				break;
 			}
@@ -579,6 +559,31 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 			if (!nfit_mem)
 				return -ENOMEM;
 			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfit_mem->list);
+			list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
+		}
+
+		list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
+			if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
+				continue;
+			/*
+			 * Record the control region for the dimm.  For
+			 * the ACPI 6.1 case, where there are separate
+			 * control regions for the pmem vs blk
+			 * interfaces, be sure to record the extended
+			 * blk details.
+			 */
+			if (!nfit_mem->dcr)
+				nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
+			else if (nfit_mem->dcr->windows == 0
+					&& nfit_dcr->dcr->windows)
+				nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		if (dcr && !nfit_mem->dcr) {
+			dev_err(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing DCR %d\n",
+					spa->range_index, dcr);
+			return -ENODEV;
 		}
 
 		if (type == NFIT_SPA_DCR) {
@@ -595,6 +600,7 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 				nfit_mem->idt_dcr = nfit_idt->idt;
 				break;
 			}
+			nfit_mem_init_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
 		} else {
 			/*
 			 * A single dimm may belong to multiple SPA-PM
@@ -603,13 +609,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 			 */
 			nfit_mem->memdev_pmem = nfit_memdev->memdev;
 		}
-
-		if (found)
-			continue;
-
-		rc = nfit_mem_add(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
-		if (rc)
-			return rc;
 	}
 
 	return 0;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 1/3] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility
@ 2016-02-08 18:30   ` Dan Williams
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2016-02-08 18:30 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, stable

ACPI 6.1 clarified that multi-interface dimms require multiple control
region entries (DCRs) per dimm.  Previously we were assuming that a
control region is only present when block-data-windows are present.
This implementation was done with an eye to be compatibility with the
looser ACPI 6.0 interpretation of this table.

1/ When coalescing the memory device (MEMDEV) tables for a single dimm,
coalesce on device_handle rather than control region index.

2/ Whenever we disocver a control region with non-zero block windows
re-scan for block-data-window (BDW) entries.

We may need to revisit this if a DIMM ever implements a format interface
outside of blk or pmem, but that is not on the foreseeable horizon.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/nfit.c |   71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
 1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
index ad6d8c6b777e..424b362e8fdc 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
@@ -469,37 +469,16 @@ static void nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 	nfit_mem->bdw = NULL;
 }
 
-static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
+static void nfit_mem_init_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 		struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, struct acpi_nfit_system_address *spa)
 {
 	u16 dcr = __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index;
 	struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
 	struct nfit_flush *nfit_flush;
-	struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
 	struct nfit_bdw *nfit_bdw;
 	struct nfit_idt *nfit_idt;
 	u16 idt_idx, range_index;
 
-	list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
-		if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
-			continue;
-		nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
-		break;
-	}
-
-	if (!nfit_mem->dcr) {
-		dev_dbg(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing:%s%s\n",
-				spa->range_index, __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)
-				? "" : " MEMDEV", nfit_mem->dcr ? "" : " DCR");
-		return -ENODEV;
-	}
-
-	/*
-	 * We've found enough to create an nvdimm, optionally
-	 * find an associated BDW
-	 */
-	list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
-
 	list_for_each_entry(nfit_bdw, &acpi_desc->bdws, list) {
 		if (nfit_bdw->bdw->region_index != dcr)
 			continue;
@@ -508,12 +487,12 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 	}
 
 	if (!nfit_mem->bdw)
-		return 0;
+		return;
 
 	nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem);
 
 	if (!nfit_mem->spa_bdw)
-		return 0;
+		return;
 
 	range_index = nfit_mem->spa_bdw->range_index;
 	list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
@@ -538,8 +517,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 		}
 		break;
 	}
-
-	return 0;
 }
 
 static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
@@ -548,7 +525,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 	struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, *found;
 	struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
 	int type = nfit_spa_type(spa);
-	u16 dcr;
 
 	switch (type) {
 	case NFIT_SPA_DCR:
@@ -559,14 +535,18 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 	}
 
 	list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
-		int rc;
+		struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
+		u32 device_handle;
+		u16 dcr;
 
 		if (nfit_memdev->memdev->range_index != spa->range_index)
 			continue;
 		found = NULL;
 		dcr = nfit_memdev->memdev->region_index;
+		device_handle = nfit_memdev->memdev->device_handle;
 		list_for_each_entry(nfit_mem, &acpi_desc->dimms, list)
-			if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index == dcr) {
+			if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->device_handle
+					== device_handle) {
 				found = nfit_mem;
 				break;
 			}
@@ -579,6 +559,31 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 			if (!nfit_mem)
 				return -ENOMEM;
 			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfit_mem->list);
+			list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
+		}
+
+		list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
+			if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
+				continue;
+			/*
+			 * Record the control region for the dimm.  For
+			 * the ACPI 6.1 case, where there are separate
+			 * control regions for the pmem vs blk
+			 * interfaces, be sure to record the extended
+			 * blk details.
+			 */
+			if (!nfit_mem->dcr)
+				nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
+			else if (nfit_mem->dcr->windows == 0
+					&& nfit_dcr->dcr->windows)
+				nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		if (dcr && !nfit_mem->dcr) {
+			dev_err(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing DCR %d\n",
+					spa->range_index, dcr);
+			return -ENODEV;
 		}
 
 		if (type == NFIT_SPA_DCR) {
@@ -595,6 +600,7 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 				nfit_mem->idt_dcr = nfit_idt->idt;
 				break;
 			}
+			nfit_mem_init_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
 		} else {
 			/*
 			 * A single dimm may belong to multiple SPA-PM
@@ -603,13 +609,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
 			 */
 			nfit_mem->memdev_pmem = nfit_memdev->memdev;
 		}
-
-		if (found)
-			continue;
-
-		rc = nfit_mem_add(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
-		if (rc)
-			return rc;
 	}
 
 	return 0;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] nfit, tools/testing/nvdimm: add format interface code definitions
  2016-02-08 18:30 ` Dan Williams
@ 2016-02-08 18:31   ` Dan Williams
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2016-02-08 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel

ACPI 6.1 and JEDEC Annex L Release 3 formalize the format interface
code.  Add definitions and update their usage in the unit test.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/nfit.h              |    6 ++++++
 tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c |    7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.h b/drivers/acpi/nfit.h
index 3d549a383659..6689b0aaf194 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.h
@@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ enum nfit_uuids {
 	NFIT_UUID_MAX,
 };
 
+enum nfit_fic {
+	NFIT_FIC_BYTE = 0x101, /* byte-addressable energy backed */
+	NFIT_FIC_BLK = 0x201, /* block-addressable non-energy backed */
+	NFIT_FIC_BYTEN = 0x301, /* byte-addressable non-energy backed */
+};
+
 enum {
 	ND_BLK_READ_FLUSH = 1,
 	ND_BLK_DCR_LATCH = 2,
diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
index 90bd2ea41032..f9d37143e264 100644
--- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
+++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
@@ -819,6 +819,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->device_id = 0;
 	dcr->revision_id = 1;
 	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[0];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
 	dcr->windows = 1;
 	dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
 	dcr->command_offset = 0;
@@ -835,6 +836,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->device_id = 0;
 	dcr->revision_id = 1;
 	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[1];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
 	dcr->windows = 1;
 	dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
 	dcr->command_offset = 0;
@@ -851,6 +853,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->device_id = 0;
 	dcr->revision_id = 1;
 	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[2];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
 	dcr->windows = 1;
 	dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
 	dcr->command_offset = 0;
@@ -867,6 +870,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->device_id = 0;
 	dcr->revision_id = 1;
 	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[3];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
 	dcr->windows = 1;
 	dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
 	dcr->command_offset = 0;
@@ -963,6 +967,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 		dcr->device_id = 0;
 		dcr->revision_id = 1;
 		dcr->serial_number = ~handle[4];
+		dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
 		dcr->windows = 1;
 		dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
 		dcr->command_offset = 0;
@@ -1132,7 +1137,7 @@ static void nfit_test1_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->device_id = 0;
 	dcr->revision_id = 1;
 	dcr->serial_number = ~0;
-	dcr->code = 0x201;
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTE;
 	dcr->windows = 0;
 	dcr->window_size = 0;
 	dcr->command_offset = 0;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 2/3] nfit, tools/testing/nvdimm: add format interface code definitions
@ 2016-02-08 18:31   ` Dan Williams
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2016-02-08 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel

ACPI 6.1 and JEDEC Annex L Release 3 formalize the format interface
code.  Add definitions and update their usage in the unit test.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 drivers/acpi/nfit.h              |    6 ++++++
 tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c |    7 ++++++-
 2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.h b/drivers/acpi/nfit.h
index 3d549a383659..6689b0aaf194 100644
--- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.h
+++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.h
@@ -40,6 +40,12 @@ enum nfit_uuids {
 	NFIT_UUID_MAX,
 };
 
+enum nfit_fic {
+	NFIT_FIC_BYTE = 0x101, /* byte-addressable energy backed */
+	NFIT_FIC_BLK = 0x201, /* block-addressable non-energy backed */
+	NFIT_FIC_BYTEN = 0x301, /* byte-addressable non-energy backed */
+};
+
 enum {
 	ND_BLK_READ_FLUSH = 1,
 	ND_BLK_DCR_LATCH = 2,
diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
index 90bd2ea41032..f9d37143e264 100644
--- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
+++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
@@ -819,6 +819,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->device_id = 0;
 	dcr->revision_id = 1;
 	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[0];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
 	dcr->windows = 1;
 	dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
 	dcr->command_offset = 0;
@@ -835,6 +836,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->device_id = 0;
 	dcr->revision_id = 1;
 	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[1];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
 	dcr->windows = 1;
 	dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
 	dcr->command_offset = 0;
@@ -851,6 +853,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->device_id = 0;
 	dcr->revision_id = 1;
 	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[2];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
 	dcr->windows = 1;
 	dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
 	dcr->command_offset = 0;
@@ -867,6 +870,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->device_id = 0;
 	dcr->revision_id = 1;
 	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[3];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
 	dcr->windows = 1;
 	dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
 	dcr->command_offset = 0;
@@ -963,6 +967,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 		dcr->device_id = 0;
 		dcr->revision_id = 1;
 		dcr->serial_number = ~handle[4];
+		dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BLK;
 		dcr->windows = 1;
 		dcr->window_size = DCR_SIZE;
 		dcr->command_offset = 0;
@@ -1132,7 +1137,7 @@ static void nfit_test1_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->device_id = 0;
 	dcr->revision_id = 1;
 	dcr->serial_number = ~0;
-	dcr->code = 0x201;
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTE;
 	dcr->windows = 0;
 	dcr->window_size = 0;
 	dcr->command_offset = 0;

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] nfit, tools/testing/nvdimm: test multiple control regions per-dimm
  2016-02-08 18:30 ` Dan Williams
@ 2016-02-08 18:31   ` Dan Williams
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2016-02-08 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel

ACPI 6.1 clarifies that "The system shall include an NVDIMM Control
Region Structure for every Function Interface in the NVDIMM."
Implement this clarification in nfit_test.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c |  118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
index f9d37143e264..f4f15c544d66 100644
--- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
+++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
@@ -425,6 +425,8 @@ static int nfit_test0_alloc(struct nfit_test *t)
 	size_t nfit_size = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_system_address) * NUM_SPA
 			+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * NUM_MEM
 			+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region) * NUM_DCR
+			+ offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+					window_size) * NUM_DCR
 			+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region) * NUM_BDW
 			+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address) * NUM_DCR;
 	int i;
@@ -474,7 +476,7 @@ static int nfit_test1_alloc(struct nfit_test *t)
 {
 	size_t nfit_size = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_system_address)
 		+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map)
-		+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
+		+ offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region, window_size);
 
 	t->nfit_buf = test_alloc(t, nfit_size, &t->nfit_dma);
 	if (!t->nfit_buf)
@@ -607,7 +609,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->physical_id = 0;
 	memdev->region_id = 0;
 	memdev->range_index = 0+1;
-	memdev->region_index = 0+1;
+	memdev->region_index = 4+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2;
 	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0];
 	memdev->address = 0;
@@ -622,7 +624,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->physical_id = 1;
 	memdev->region_id = 0;
 	memdev->range_index = 0+1;
-	memdev->region_index = 1+1;
+	memdev->region_index = 5+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2;
 	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0] + SPA0_SIZE/2;
 	memdev->address = 0;
@@ -637,7 +639,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->physical_id = 0;
 	memdev->region_id = 1;
 	memdev->range_index = 1+1;
-	memdev->region_index = 0+1;
+	memdev->region_index = 4+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1];
 	memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
@@ -652,7 +654,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->physical_id = 1;
 	memdev->region_id = 1;
 	memdev->range_index = 1+1;
-	memdev->region_index = 1+1;
+	memdev->region_index = 5+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
@@ -667,7 +669,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->physical_id = 2;
 	memdev->region_id = 0;
 	memdev->range_index = 1+1;
-	memdev->region_index = 2+1;
+	memdev->region_index = 6+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 2*SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
@@ -682,7 +684,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->physical_id = 3;
 	memdev->region_id = 0;
 	memdev->range_index = 1+1;
-	memdev->region_index = 3+1;
+	memdev->region_index = 7+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 3*SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
@@ -810,7 +812,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
 
 	offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 14;
-	/* dcr-descriptor0 */
+	/* dcr-descriptor0: blk */
 	dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
 	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
 	dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
@@ -827,7 +829,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->status_offset = 8;
 	dcr->status_size = 4;
 
-	/* dcr-descriptor1 */
+	/* dcr-descriptor1: blk */
 	dcr = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
 	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
 	dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
@@ -844,7 +846,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->status_offset = 8;
 	dcr->status_size = 4;
 
-	/* dcr-descriptor2 */
+	/* dcr-descriptor2: blk */
 	dcr = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region) * 2;
 	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
 	dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
@@ -861,7 +863,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->status_offset = 8;
 	dcr->status_size = 4;
 
-	/* dcr-descriptor3 */
+	/* dcr-descriptor3: blk */
 	dcr = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region) * 3;
 	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
 	dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
@@ -879,6 +881,63 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->status_size = 4;
 
 	offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region) * 4;
+	/* dcr-descriptor0: pmem */
+	dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
+	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
+	dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size);
+	dcr->region_index = 4+1;
+	dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
+	dcr->device_id = 0;
+	dcr->revision_id = 1;
+	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[0];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
+	dcr->windows = 0;
+
+	/* dcr-descriptor1: pmem */
+	dcr = nfit_buf + offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size);
+	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
+	dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size);
+	dcr->region_index = 5+1;
+	dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
+	dcr->device_id = 0;
+	dcr->revision_id = 1;
+	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[1];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
+	dcr->windows = 0;
+
+	/* dcr-descriptor2: pmem */
+	dcr = nfit_buf + offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size) * 2;
+	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
+	dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size);
+	dcr->region_index = 6+1;
+	dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
+	dcr->device_id = 0;
+	dcr->revision_id = 1;
+	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[2];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
+	dcr->windows = 0;
+
+	/* dcr-descriptor3: pmem */
+	dcr = nfit_buf + offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size) * 3;
+	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
+	dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size);
+	dcr->region_index = 7+1;
+	dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
+	dcr->device_id = 0;
+	dcr->revision_id = 1;
+	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[3];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
+	dcr->windows = 0;
+
+	offset = offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size) * 4;
 	/* bdw0 (spa/dcr0, dimm0) */
 	bdw = nfit_buf + offset;
 	bdw->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_DATA_REGION;
@@ -958,11 +1017,11 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 
 	if (t->setup_hotplug) {
 		offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address) * 4;
-		/* dcr-descriptor4 */
+		/* dcr-descriptor4: blk */
 		dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
 		dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
 		dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
-		dcr->region_index = 4+1;
+		dcr->region_index = 8+1;
 		dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
 		dcr->device_id = 0;
 		dcr->revision_id = 1;
@@ -976,11 +1035,26 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 		dcr->status_size = 4;
 
 		offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
+		/* dcr-descriptor4: pmem */
+		dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
+		dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
+		dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+				window_size);
+		dcr->region_index = 9+1;
+		dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
+		dcr->device_id = 0;
+		dcr->revision_id = 1;
+		dcr->serial_number = ~handle[4];
+		dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
+		dcr->windows = 0;
+
+		offset = offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+				window_size);
 		/* bdw4 (spa/dcr4, dimm4) */
 		bdw = nfit_buf + offset;
 		bdw->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_DATA_REGION;
 		bdw->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region);
-		bdw->region_index = 4+1;
+		bdw->region_index = 8+1;
 		bdw->windows = 1;
 		bdw->offset = 0;
 		bdw->size = BDW_SIZE;
@@ -1028,7 +1102,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 		memdev->physical_id = 4;
 		memdev->region_id = 0;
 		memdev->range_index = 10+1;
-		memdev->region_index = 4+1;
+		memdev->region_index = 8+1;
 		memdev->region_size = 0;
 		memdev->region_offset = 0;
 		memdev->address = 0;
@@ -1044,14 +1118,14 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 		memdev->physical_id = 4;
 		memdev->region_id = 0;
 		memdev->range_index = 11+1;
-		memdev->region_index = 4+1;
+		memdev->region_index = 9+1;
 		memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE;
 		memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[2];
 		memdev->address = 0;
 		memdev->interleave_index = 0;
 		memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
 
-		/* mem-region16 (spa/dcr4, dimm4) */
+		/* mem-region16 (spa/bdw4, dimm4) */
 		memdev = nfit_buf + offset +
 				sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 2;
 		memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
@@ -1060,7 +1134,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 		memdev->physical_id = 4;
 		memdev->region_id = 0;
 		memdev->range_index = 12+1;
-		memdev->region_index = 4+1;
+		memdev->region_index = 8+1;
 		memdev->region_size = 0;
 		memdev->region_offset = 0;
 		memdev->address = 0;
@@ -1131,7 +1205,8 @@ static void nfit_test1_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	/* dcr-descriptor0 */
 	dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
 	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
-	dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
+	dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size);
 	dcr->region_index = 0+1;
 	dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
 	dcr->device_id = 0;
@@ -1139,11 +1214,6 @@ static void nfit_test1_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->serial_number = ~0;
 	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTE;
 	dcr->windows = 0;
-	dcr->window_size = 0;
-	dcr->command_offset = 0;
-	dcr->command_size = 0;
-	dcr->status_offset = 0;
-	dcr->status_size = 0;
 
 	acpi_desc = &t->acpi_desc;
 	set_bit(ND_CMD_ARS_CAP, &acpi_desc->bus_dsm_force_en);

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* [PATCH 3/3] nfit, tools/testing/nvdimm: test multiple control regions per-dimm
@ 2016-02-08 18:31   ` Dan Williams
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2016-02-08 18:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel

ACPI 6.1 clarifies that "The system shall include an NVDIMM Control
Region Structure for every Function Interface in the NVDIMM."
Implement this clarification in nfit_test.

Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
---
 tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c |  118 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 94 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
index f9d37143e264..f4f15c544d66 100644
--- a/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
+++ b/tools/testing/nvdimm/test/nfit.c
@@ -425,6 +425,8 @@ static int nfit_test0_alloc(struct nfit_test *t)
 	size_t nfit_size = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_system_address) * NUM_SPA
 			+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * NUM_MEM
 			+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region) * NUM_DCR
+			+ offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+					window_size) * NUM_DCR
 			+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region) * NUM_BDW
 			+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address) * NUM_DCR;
 	int i;
@@ -474,7 +476,7 @@ static int nfit_test1_alloc(struct nfit_test *t)
 {
 	size_t nfit_size = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_system_address)
 		+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map)
-		+ sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
+		+ offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region, window_size);
 
 	t->nfit_buf = test_alloc(t, nfit_size, &t->nfit_dma);
 	if (!t->nfit_buf)
@@ -607,7 +609,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->physical_id = 0;
 	memdev->region_id = 0;
 	memdev->range_index = 0+1;
-	memdev->region_index = 0+1;
+	memdev->region_index = 4+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2;
 	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0];
 	memdev->address = 0;
@@ -622,7 +624,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->physical_id = 1;
 	memdev->region_id = 0;
 	memdev->range_index = 0+1;
-	memdev->region_index = 1+1;
+	memdev->region_index = 5+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE/2;
 	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[0] + SPA0_SIZE/2;
 	memdev->address = 0;
@@ -637,7 +639,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->physical_id = 0;
 	memdev->region_id = 1;
 	memdev->range_index = 1+1;
-	memdev->region_index = 0+1;
+	memdev->region_index = 4+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1];
 	memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
@@ -652,7 +654,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->physical_id = 1;
 	memdev->region_id = 1;
 	memdev->range_index = 1+1;
-	memdev->region_index = 1+1;
+	memdev->region_index = 5+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
@@ -667,7 +669,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->physical_id = 2;
 	memdev->region_id = 0;
 	memdev->range_index = 1+1;
-	memdev->region_index = 2+1;
+	memdev->region_index = 6+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 2*SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
@@ -682,7 +684,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->physical_id = 3;
 	memdev->region_id = 0;
 	memdev->range_index = 1+1;
-	memdev->region_index = 3+1;
+	memdev->region_index = 7+1;
 	memdev->region_size = SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[1] + 3*SPA1_SIZE/4;
 	memdev->address = SPA0_SIZE/2;
@@ -810,7 +812,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
 
 	offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 14;
-	/* dcr-descriptor0 */
+	/* dcr-descriptor0: blk */
 	dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
 	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
 	dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
@@ -827,7 +829,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->status_offset = 8;
 	dcr->status_size = 4;
 
-	/* dcr-descriptor1 */
+	/* dcr-descriptor1: blk */
 	dcr = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
 	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
 	dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
@@ -844,7 +846,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->status_offset = 8;
 	dcr->status_size = 4;
 
-	/* dcr-descriptor2 */
+	/* dcr-descriptor2: blk */
 	dcr = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region) * 2;
 	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
 	dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
@@ -861,7 +863,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->status_offset = 8;
 	dcr->status_size = 4;
 
-	/* dcr-descriptor3 */
+	/* dcr-descriptor3: blk */
 	dcr = nfit_buf + offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region) * 3;
 	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
 	dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
@@ -879,6 +881,63 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->status_size = 4;
 
 	offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region) * 4;
+	/* dcr-descriptor0: pmem */
+	dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
+	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
+	dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size);
+	dcr->region_index = 4+1;
+	dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
+	dcr->device_id = 0;
+	dcr->revision_id = 1;
+	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[0];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
+	dcr->windows = 0;
+
+	/* dcr-descriptor1: pmem */
+	dcr = nfit_buf + offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size);
+	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
+	dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size);
+	dcr->region_index = 5+1;
+	dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
+	dcr->device_id = 0;
+	dcr->revision_id = 1;
+	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[1];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
+	dcr->windows = 0;
+
+	/* dcr-descriptor2: pmem */
+	dcr = nfit_buf + offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size) * 2;
+	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
+	dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size);
+	dcr->region_index = 6+1;
+	dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
+	dcr->device_id = 0;
+	dcr->revision_id = 1;
+	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[2];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
+	dcr->windows = 0;
+
+	/* dcr-descriptor3: pmem */
+	dcr = nfit_buf + offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size) * 3;
+	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
+	dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size);
+	dcr->region_index = 7+1;
+	dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
+	dcr->device_id = 0;
+	dcr->revision_id = 1;
+	dcr->serial_number = ~handle[3];
+	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
+	dcr->windows = 0;
+
+	offset = offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size) * 4;
 	/* bdw0 (spa/dcr0, dimm0) */
 	bdw = nfit_buf + offset;
 	bdw->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_DATA_REGION;
@@ -958,11 +1017,11 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 
 	if (t->setup_hotplug) {
 		offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_flush_address) * 4;
-		/* dcr-descriptor4 */
+		/* dcr-descriptor4: blk */
 		dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
 		dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
 		dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
-		dcr->region_index = 4+1;
+		dcr->region_index = 8+1;
 		dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
 		dcr->device_id = 0;
 		dcr->revision_id = 1;
@@ -976,11 +1035,26 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 		dcr->status_size = 4;
 
 		offset = offset + sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
+		/* dcr-descriptor4: pmem */
+		dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
+		dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
+		dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+				window_size);
+		dcr->region_index = 9+1;
+		dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
+		dcr->device_id = 0;
+		dcr->revision_id = 1;
+		dcr->serial_number = ~handle[4];
+		dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTEN;
+		dcr->windows = 0;
+
+		offset = offset + offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+				window_size);
 		/* bdw4 (spa/dcr4, dimm4) */
 		bdw = nfit_buf + offset;
 		bdw->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_DATA_REGION;
 		bdw->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_data_region);
-		bdw->region_index = 4+1;
+		bdw->region_index = 8+1;
 		bdw->windows = 1;
 		bdw->offset = 0;
 		bdw->size = BDW_SIZE;
@@ -1028,7 +1102,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 		memdev->physical_id = 4;
 		memdev->region_id = 0;
 		memdev->range_index = 10+1;
-		memdev->region_index = 4+1;
+		memdev->region_index = 8+1;
 		memdev->region_size = 0;
 		memdev->region_offset = 0;
 		memdev->address = 0;
@@ -1044,14 +1118,14 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 		memdev->physical_id = 4;
 		memdev->region_id = 0;
 		memdev->range_index = 11+1;
-		memdev->region_index = 4+1;
+		memdev->region_index = 9+1;
 		memdev->region_size = SPA0_SIZE;
 		memdev->region_offset = t->spa_set_dma[2];
 		memdev->address = 0;
 		memdev->interleave_index = 0;
 		memdev->interleave_ways = 1;
 
-		/* mem-region16 (spa/dcr4, dimm4) */
+		/* mem-region16 (spa/bdw4, dimm4) */
 		memdev = nfit_buf + offset +
 				sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_memory_map) * 2;
 		memdev->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_MEMORY_MAP;
@@ -1060,7 +1134,7 @@ static void nfit_test0_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 		memdev->physical_id = 4;
 		memdev->region_id = 0;
 		memdev->range_index = 12+1;
-		memdev->region_index = 4+1;
+		memdev->region_index = 8+1;
 		memdev->region_size = 0;
 		memdev->region_offset = 0;
 		memdev->address = 0;
@@ -1131,7 +1205,8 @@ static void nfit_test1_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	/* dcr-descriptor0 */
 	dcr = nfit_buf + offset;
 	dcr->header.type = ACPI_NFIT_TYPE_CONTROL_REGION;
-	dcr->header.length = sizeof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region);
+	dcr->header.length = offsetof(struct acpi_nfit_control_region,
+			window_size);
 	dcr->region_index = 0+1;
 	dcr->vendor_id = 0xabcd;
 	dcr->device_id = 0;
@@ -1139,11 +1214,6 @@ static void nfit_test1_setup(struct nfit_test *t)
 	dcr->serial_number = ~0;
 	dcr->code = NFIT_FIC_BYTE;
 	dcr->windows = 0;
-	dcr->window_size = 0;
-	dcr->command_offset = 0;
-	dcr->command_size = 0;
-	dcr->status_offset = 0;
-	dcr->status_size = 0;
 
 	acpi_desc = &t->acpi_desc;
 	set_bit(ND_CMD_ARS_CAP, &acpi_desc->bus_dsm_force_en);

^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/3] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility
  2016-02-08 18:30   ` Dan Williams
@ 2016-02-08 19:10     ` Linda Knippers
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Linda Knippers @ 2016-02-08 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Williams, linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, stable

On 2/8/2016 1:30 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> ACPI 6.1 clarified that multi-interface dimms require multiple control
> region entries (DCRs) per dimm.  Previously we were assuming that a
> control region is only present when block-data-windows are present.

We need to give this a quick test with NVDIMM-N because those types of
NVDIMMs have control regions without block-data-windows.  We've fixed
bugs related to that assumption a couple of times.

> This implementation was done with an eye to be compatibility with the
> looser ACPI 6.0 interpretation of this table.
> 
> 1/ When coalescing the memory device (MEMDEV) tables for a single dimm,
> coalesce on device_handle rather than control region index.
> 
> 2/ Whenever we disocver a control region with non-zero block windows
discover

> re-scan for block-data-window (BDW) entries.
> 
> We may need to revisit this if a DIMM ever implements a format interface
> outside of blk or pmem, but that is not on the foreseeable horizon.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/nfit.c |   71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> index ad6d8c6b777e..424b362e8fdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> @@ -469,37 +469,16 @@ static void nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  	nfit_mem->bdw = NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
> +static void nfit_mem_init_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  		struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, struct acpi_nfit_system_address *spa)
>  {
>  	u16 dcr = __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index;
>  	struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
>  	struct nfit_flush *nfit_flush;
> -	struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
>  	struct nfit_bdw *nfit_bdw;
>  	struct nfit_idt *nfit_idt;
>  	u16 idt_idx, range_index;
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
> -		if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
> -			continue;
> -		nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
> -		break;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (!nfit_mem->dcr) {
> -		dev_dbg(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing:%s%s\n",
> -				spa->range_index, __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)
> -				? "" : " MEMDEV", nfit_mem->dcr ? "" : " DCR");
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * We've found enough to create an nvdimm, optionally
> -	 * find an associated BDW
> -	 */
> -	list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
> -
>  	list_for_each_entry(nfit_bdw, &acpi_desc->bdws, list) {
>  		if (nfit_bdw->bdw->region_index != dcr)
>  			continue;
> @@ -508,12 +487,12 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!nfit_mem->bdw)
> -		return 0;
> +		return;
>  
>  	nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem);
>  
>  	if (!nfit_mem->spa_bdw)
> -		return 0;
> +		return;
>  
>  	range_index = nfit_mem->spa_bdw->range_index;
>  	list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
> @@ -538,8 +517,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	}
> -
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
> @@ -548,7 +525,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  	struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, *found;
>  	struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
>  	int type = nfit_spa_type(spa);
> -	u16 dcr;
>  
>  	switch (type) {
>  	case NFIT_SPA_DCR:
> @@ -559,14 +535,18 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  	}
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
> -		int rc;
> +		struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
> +		u32 device_handle;
> +		u16 dcr;
>  
>  		if (nfit_memdev->memdev->range_index != spa->range_index)
>  			continue;
>  		found = NULL;
>  		dcr = nfit_memdev->memdev->region_index;
> +		device_handle = nfit_memdev->memdev->device_handle;
>  		list_for_each_entry(nfit_mem, &acpi_desc->dimms, list)
> -			if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index == dcr) {
> +			if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->device_handle
> +					== device_handle) {
>  				found = nfit_mem;
>  				break;
>  			}
> @@ -579,6 +559,31 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  			if (!nfit_mem)
>  				return -ENOMEM;
>  			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfit_mem->list);
> +			list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
> +		}
> +
> +		list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
> +			if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
> +				continue;
> +			/*
> +			 * Record the control region for the dimm.  For
> +			 * the ACPI 6.1 case, where there are separate
> +			 * control regions for the pmem vs blk
> +			 * interfaces, be sure to record the extended
> +			 * blk details.
> +			 */
> +			if (!nfit_mem->dcr)
> +				nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
> +			else if (nfit_mem->dcr->windows == 0
> +					&& nfit_dcr->dcr->windows)
> +				nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (dcr && !nfit_mem->dcr) {
> +			dev_err(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing DCR %d\n",
> +					spa->range_index, dcr);
> +			return -ENODEV;
>  		}
>  
>  		if (type == NFIT_SPA_DCR) {
> @@ -595,6 +600,7 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  				nfit_mem->idt_dcr = nfit_idt->idt;
>  				break;
>  			}
> +			nfit_mem_init_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
>  		} else {
>  			/*
>  			 * A single dimm may belong to multiple SPA-PM
> @@ -603,13 +609,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  			 */
>  			nfit_mem->memdev_pmem = nfit_memdev->memdev;
>  		}
> -
> -		if (found)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		rc = nfit_mem_add(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
> -		if (rc)
> -			return rc;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-nvdimm mailing list
> Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/3] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility
@ 2016-02-08 19:10     ` Linda Knippers
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Linda Knippers @ 2016-02-08 19:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Williams, linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, stable

On 2/8/2016 1:30 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> ACPI 6.1 clarified that multi-interface dimms require multiple control
> region entries (DCRs) per dimm.  Previously we were assuming that a
> control region is only present when block-data-windows are present.

We need to give this a quick test with NVDIMM-N because those types of
NVDIMMs have control regions without block-data-windows.  We've fixed
bugs related to that assumption a couple of times.

> This implementation was done with an eye to be compatibility with the
> looser ACPI 6.0 interpretation of this table.
> 
> 1/ When coalescing the memory device (MEMDEV) tables for a single dimm,
> coalesce on device_handle rather than control region index.
> 
> 2/ Whenever we disocver a control region with non-zero block windows
discover

> re-scan for block-data-window (BDW) entries.
> 
> We may need to revisit this if a DIMM ever implements a format interface
> outside of blk or pmem, but that is not on the foreseeable horizon.
> 
> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> ---
>  drivers/acpi/nfit.c |   71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> index ad6d8c6b777e..424b362e8fdc 100644
> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
> @@ -469,37 +469,16 @@ static void nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  	nfit_mem->bdw = NULL;
>  }
>  
> -static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
> +static void nfit_mem_init_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  		struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, struct acpi_nfit_system_address *spa)
>  {
>  	u16 dcr = __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index;
>  	struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
>  	struct nfit_flush *nfit_flush;
> -	struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
>  	struct nfit_bdw *nfit_bdw;
>  	struct nfit_idt *nfit_idt;
>  	u16 idt_idx, range_index;
>  
> -	list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
> -		if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
> -			continue;
> -		nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
> -		break;
> -	}
> -
> -	if (!nfit_mem->dcr) {
> -		dev_dbg(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing:%s%s\n",
> -				spa->range_index, __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)
> -				? "" : " MEMDEV", nfit_mem->dcr ? "" : " DCR");
> -		return -ENODEV;
> -	}
> -
> -	/*
> -	 * We've found enough to create an nvdimm, optionally
> -	 * find an associated BDW
> -	 */
> -	list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
> -
>  	list_for_each_entry(nfit_bdw, &acpi_desc->bdws, list) {
>  		if (nfit_bdw->bdw->region_index != dcr)
>  			continue;
> @@ -508,12 +487,12 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  	}
>  
>  	if (!nfit_mem->bdw)
> -		return 0;
> +		return;
>  
>  	nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem);
>  
>  	if (!nfit_mem->spa_bdw)
> -		return 0;
> +		return;
>  
>  	range_index = nfit_mem->spa_bdw->range_index;
>  	list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
> @@ -538,8 +517,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  		}
>  		break;
>  	}
> -
> -	return 0;
>  }
>  
>  static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
> @@ -548,7 +525,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  	struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, *found;
>  	struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
>  	int type = nfit_spa_type(spa);
> -	u16 dcr;
>  
>  	switch (type) {
>  	case NFIT_SPA_DCR:
> @@ -559,14 +535,18 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  	}
>  
>  	list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
> -		int rc;
> +		struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
> +		u32 device_handle;
> +		u16 dcr;
>  
>  		if (nfit_memdev->memdev->range_index != spa->range_index)
>  			continue;
>  		found = NULL;
>  		dcr = nfit_memdev->memdev->region_index;
> +		device_handle = nfit_memdev->memdev->device_handle;
>  		list_for_each_entry(nfit_mem, &acpi_desc->dimms, list)
> -			if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index == dcr) {
> +			if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->device_handle
> +					== device_handle) {
>  				found = nfit_mem;
>  				break;
>  			}
> @@ -579,6 +559,31 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  			if (!nfit_mem)
>  				return -ENOMEM;
>  			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfit_mem->list);
> +			list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
> +		}
> +
> +		list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
> +			if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
> +				continue;
> +			/*
> +			 * Record the control region for the dimm.  For
> +			 * the ACPI 6.1 case, where there are separate
> +			 * control regions for the pmem vs blk
> +			 * interfaces, be sure to record the extended
> +			 * blk details.
> +			 */
> +			if (!nfit_mem->dcr)
> +				nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
> +			else if (nfit_mem->dcr->windows == 0
> +					&& nfit_dcr->dcr->windows)
> +				nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
> +			break;
> +		}
> +
> +		if (dcr && !nfit_mem->dcr) {
> +			dev_err(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing DCR %d\n",
> +					spa->range_index, dcr);
> +			return -ENODEV;
>  		}
>  
>  		if (type == NFIT_SPA_DCR) {
> @@ -595,6 +600,7 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  				nfit_mem->idt_dcr = nfit_idt->idt;
>  				break;
>  			}
> +			nfit_mem_init_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
>  		} else {
>  			/*
>  			 * A single dimm may belong to multiple SPA-PM
> @@ -603,13 +609,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>  			 */
>  			nfit_mem->memdev_pmem = nfit_memdev->memdev;
>  		}
> -
> -		if (found)
> -			continue;
> -
> -		rc = nfit_mem_add(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
> -		if (rc)
> -			return rc;
>  	}
>  
>  	return 0;
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Linux-nvdimm mailing list
> Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
> 

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/3] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility
  2016-02-08 19:10     ` Linda Knippers
@ 2016-02-08 20:23       ` Linda Knippers
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Linda Knippers @ 2016-02-08 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Williams, linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, stable

On 2/8/2016 2:10 PM, Linda Knippers wrote:
> On 2/8/2016 1:30 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> ACPI 6.1 clarified that multi-interface dimms require multiple control
>> region entries (DCRs) per dimm.  Previously we were assuming that a
>> control region is only present when block-data-windows are present.
> 
> We need to give this a quick test with NVDIMM-N because those types of
> NVDIMMs have control regions without block-data-windows.  We've fixed
> bugs related to that assumption a couple of times.

I can't test the conditions for which these changes were made but the
code continues to work on my NVDIMM-N system where we have control
regions w/o block-data windows.

-- ljk

> 
>> This implementation was done with an eye to be compatibility with the
>> looser ACPI 6.0 interpretation of this table.
>>
>> 1/ When coalescing the memory device (MEMDEV) tables for a single dimm,
>> coalesce on device_handle rather than control region index.
>>
>> 2/ Whenever we disocver a control region with non-zero block windows
> discover
> 
>> re-scan for block-data-window (BDW) entries.
>>
>> We may need to revisit this if a DIMM ever implements a format interface
>> outside of blk or pmem, but that is not on the foreseeable horizon.
>>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/nfit.c |   71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
>> index ad6d8c6b777e..424b362e8fdc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
>> @@ -469,37 +469,16 @@ static void nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  	nfit_mem->bdw = NULL;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>> +static void nfit_mem_init_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  		struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, struct acpi_nfit_system_address *spa)
>>  {
>>  	u16 dcr = __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index;
>>  	struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
>>  	struct nfit_flush *nfit_flush;
>> -	struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
>>  	struct nfit_bdw *nfit_bdw;
>>  	struct nfit_idt *nfit_idt;
>>  	u16 idt_idx, range_index;
>>  
>> -	list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
>> -		if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
>> -			continue;
>> -		nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
>> -		break;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	if (!nfit_mem->dcr) {
>> -		dev_dbg(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing:%s%s\n",
>> -				spa->range_index, __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)
>> -				? "" : " MEMDEV", nfit_mem->dcr ? "" : " DCR");
>> -		return -ENODEV;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	/*
>> -	 * We've found enough to create an nvdimm, optionally
>> -	 * find an associated BDW
>> -	 */
>> -	list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
>> -
>>  	list_for_each_entry(nfit_bdw, &acpi_desc->bdws, list) {
>>  		if (nfit_bdw->bdw->region_index != dcr)
>>  			continue;
>> @@ -508,12 +487,12 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	if (!nfit_mem->bdw)
>> -		return 0;
>> +		return;
>>  
>>  	nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem);
>>  
>>  	if (!nfit_mem->spa_bdw)
>> -		return 0;
>> +		return;
>>  
>>  	range_index = nfit_mem->spa_bdw->range_index;
>>  	list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
>> @@ -538,8 +517,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  		}
>>  		break;
>>  	}
>> -
>> -	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>> @@ -548,7 +525,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  	struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, *found;
>>  	struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
>>  	int type = nfit_spa_type(spa);
>> -	u16 dcr;
>>  
>>  	switch (type) {
>>  	case NFIT_SPA_DCR:
>> @@ -559,14 +535,18 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
>> -		int rc;
>> +		struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
>> +		u32 device_handle;
>> +		u16 dcr;
>>  
>>  		if (nfit_memdev->memdev->range_index != spa->range_index)
>>  			continue;
>>  		found = NULL;
>>  		dcr = nfit_memdev->memdev->region_index;
>> +		device_handle = nfit_memdev->memdev->device_handle;
>>  		list_for_each_entry(nfit_mem, &acpi_desc->dimms, list)
>> -			if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index == dcr) {
>> +			if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->device_handle
>> +					== device_handle) {
>>  				found = nfit_mem;
>>  				break;
>>  			}
>> @@ -579,6 +559,31 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  			if (!nfit_mem)
>>  				return -ENOMEM;
>>  			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfit_mem->list);
>> +			list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
>> +			if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
>> +				continue;
>> +			/*
>> +			 * Record the control region for the dimm.  For
>> +			 * the ACPI 6.1 case, where there are separate
>> +			 * control regions for the pmem vs blk
>> +			 * interfaces, be sure to record the extended
>> +			 * blk details.
>> +			 */
>> +			if (!nfit_mem->dcr)
>> +				nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
>> +			else if (nfit_mem->dcr->windows == 0
>> +					&& nfit_dcr->dcr->windows)
>> +				nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (dcr && !nfit_mem->dcr) {
>> +			dev_err(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing DCR %d\n",
>> +					spa->range_index, dcr);
>> +			return -ENODEV;
>>  		}
>>  
>>  		if (type == NFIT_SPA_DCR) {
>> @@ -595,6 +600,7 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  				nfit_mem->idt_dcr = nfit_idt->idt;
>>  				break;
>>  			}
>> +			nfit_mem_init_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
>>  		} else {
>>  			/*
>>  			 * A single dimm may belong to multiple SPA-PM
>> @@ -603,13 +609,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  			 */
>>  			nfit_mem->memdev_pmem = nfit_memdev->memdev;
>>  		}
>> -
>> -		if (found)
>> -			continue;
>> -
>> -		rc = nfit_mem_add(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
>> -		if (rc)
>> -			return rc;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-nvdimm mailing list
>> Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/3] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility
@ 2016-02-08 20:23       ` Linda Knippers
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Linda Knippers @ 2016-02-08 20:23 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Williams, linux-nvdimm; +Cc: linux-acpi, linux-kernel, stable

On 2/8/2016 2:10 PM, Linda Knippers wrote:
> On 2/8/2016 1:30 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>> ACPI 6.1 clarified that multi-interface dimms require multiple control
>> region entries (DCRs) per dimm.  Previously we were assuming that a
>> control region is only present when block-data-windows are present.
> 
> We need to give this a quick test with NVDIMM-N because those types of
> NVDIMMs have control regions without block-data-windows.  We've fixed
> bugs related to that assumption a couple of times.

I can't test the conditions for which these changes were made but the
code continues to work on my NVDIMM-N system where we have control
regions w/o block-data windows.

-- ljk

> 
>> This implementation was done with an eye to be compatibility with the
>> looser ACPI 6.0 interpretation of this table.
>>
>> 1/ When coalescing the memory device (MEMDEV) tables for a single dimm,
>> coalesce on device_handle rather than control region index.
>>
>> 2/ Whenever we disocver a control region with non-zero block windows
> discover
> 
>> re-scan for block-data-window (BDW) entries.
>>
>> We may need to revisit this if a DIMM ever implements a format interface
>> outside of blk or pmem, but that is not on the foreseeable horizon.
>>
>> Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
>> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
>> ---
>>  drivers/acpi/nfit.c |   71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------
>>  1 file changed, 35 insertions(+), 36 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
>> index ad6d8c6b777e..424b362e8fdc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
>> +++ b/drivers/acpi/nfit.c
>> @@ -469,37 +469,16 @@ static void nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  	nfit_mem->bdw = NULL;
>>  }
>>  
>> -static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>> +static void nfit_mem_init_bdw(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  		struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, struct acpi_nfit_system_address *spa)
>>  {
>>  	u16 dcr = __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index;
>>  	struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
>>  	struct nfit_flush *nfit_flush;
>> -	struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
>>  	struct nfit_bdw *nfit_bdw;
>>  	struct nfit_idt *nfit_idt;
>>  	u16 idt_idx, range_index;
>>  
>> -	list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
>> -		if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
>> -			continue;
>> -		nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
>> -		break;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	if (!nfit_mem->dcr) {
>> -		dev_dbg(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing:%s%s\n",
>> -				spa->range_index, __to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)
>> -				? "" : " MEMDEV", nfit_mem->dcr ? "" : " DCR");
>> -		return -ENODEV;
>> -	}
>> -
>> -	/*
>> -	 * We've found enough to create an nvdimm, optionally
>> -	 * find an associated BDW
>> -	 */
>> -	list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
>> -
>>  	list_for_each_entry(nfit_bdw, &acpi_desc->bdws, list) {
>>  		if (nfit_bdw->bdw->region_index != dcr)
>>  			continue;
>> @@ -508,12 +487,12 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	if (!nfit_mem->bdw)
>> -		return 0;
>> +		return;
>>  
>>  	nfit_mem_find_spa_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem);
>>  
>>  	if (!nfit_mem->spa_bdw)
>> -		return 0;
>> +		return;
>>  
>>  	range_index = nfit_mem->spa_bdw->range_index;
>>  	list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
>> @@ -538,8 +517,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_add(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  		}
>>  		break;
>>  	}
>> -
>> -	return 0;
>>  }
>>  
>>  static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>> @@ -548,7 +525,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  	struct nfit_mem *nfit_mem, *found;
>>  	struct nfit_memdev *nfit_memdev;
>>  	int type = nfit_spa_type(spa);
>> -	u16 dcr;
>>  
>>  	switch (type) {
>>  	case NFIT_SPA_DCR:
>> @@ -559,14 +535,18 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	list_for_each_entry(nfit_memdev, &acpi_desc->memdevs, list) {
>> -		int rc;
>> +		struct nfit_dcr *nfit_dcr;
>> +		u32 device_handle;
>> +		u16 dcr;
>>  
>>  		if (nfit_memdev->memdev->range_index != spa->range_index)
>>  			continue;
>>  		found = NULL;
>>  		dcr = nfit_memdev->memdev->region_index;
>> +		device_handle = nfit_memdev->memdev->device_handle;
>>  		list_for_each_entry(nfit_mem, &acpi_desc->dimms, list)
>> -			if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->region_index == dcr) {
>> +			if (__to_nfit_memdev(nfit_mem)->device_handle
>> +					== device_handle) {
>>  				found = nfit_mem;
>>  				break;
>>  			}
>> @@ -579,6 +559,31 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  			if (!nfit_mem)
>>  				return -ENOMEM;
>>  			INIT_LIST_HEAD(&nfit_mem->list);
>> +			list_add(&nfit_mem->list, &acpi_desc->dimms);
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		list_for_each_entry(nfit_dcr, &acpi_desc->dcrs, list) {
>> +			if (nfit_dcr->dcr->region_index != dcr)
>> +				continue;
>> +			/*
>> +			 * Record the control region for the dimm.  For
>> +			 * the ACPI 6.1 case, where there are separate
>> +			 * control regions for the pmem vs blk
>> +			 * interfaces, be sure to record the extended
>> +			 * blk details.
>> +			 */
>> +			if (!nfit_mem->dcr)
>> +				nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
>> +			else if (nfit_mem->dcr->windows == 0
>> +					&& nfit_dcr->dcr->windows)
>> +				nfit_mem->dcr = nfit_dcr->dcr;
>> +			break;
>> +		}
>> +
>> +		if (dcr && !nfit_mem->dcr) {
>> +			dev_err(acpi_desc->dev, "SPA %d missing DCR %d\n",
>> +					spa->range_index, dcr);
>> +			return -ENODEV;
>>  		}
>>  
>>  		if (type == NFIT_SPA_DCR) {
>> @@ -595,6 +600,7 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  				nfit_mem->idt_dcr = nfit_idt->idt;
>>  				break;
>>  			}
>> +			nfit_mem_init_bdw(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
>>  		} else {
>>  			/*
>>  			 * A single dimm may belong to multiple SPA-PM
>> @@ -603,13 +609,6 @@ static int nfit_mem_dcr_init(struct acpi_nfit_desc *acpi_desc,
>>  			 */
>>  			nfit_mem->memdev_pmem = nfit_memdev->memdev;
>>  		}
>> -
>> -		if (found)
>> -			continue;
>> -
>> -		rc = nfit_mem_add(acpi_desc, nfit_mem, spa);
>> -		if (rc)
>> -			return rc;
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	return 0;
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Linux-nvdimm mailing list
>> Linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org
>> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-nvdimm
>>

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/3] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility
  2016-02-08 20:23       ` Linda Knippers
@ 2016-02-08 20:37         ` Dan Williams
  -1 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2016-02-08 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linda Knippers; +Cc: linux-nvdimm, Linux ACPI, linux-kernel, stable

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hpe.com> wrote:
> On 2/8/2016 2:10 PM, Linda Knippers wrote:
>> On 2/8/2016 1:30 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> ACPI 6.1 clarified that multi-interface dimms require multiple control
>>> region entries (DCRs) per dimm.  Previously we were assuming that a
>>> control region is only present when block-data-windows are present.
>>
>> We need to give this a quick test with NVDIMM-N because those types of
>> NVDIMMs have control regions without block-data-windows.  We've fixed
>> bugs related to that assumption a couple of times.
>
> I can't test the conditions for which these changes were made but the
> code continues to work on my NVDIMM-N system where we have control
> regions w/o block-data windows.
>

Nice, thanks for the test report!  For my part I verified that the
implementation passes the original plus the modified unit test as
updated in [PATCH 3/3].

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH 1/3] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility
@ 2016-02-08 20:37         ` Dan Williams
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 14+ messages in thread
From: Dan Williams @ 2016-02-08 20:37 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Linda Knippers
  Cc: linux-nvdimm@lists.01.org, Linux ACPI, linux-kernel, stable

On Mon, Feb 8, 2016 at 12:23 PM, Linda Knippers <linda.knippers@hpe.com> wrote:
> On 2/8/2016 2:10 PM, Linda Knippers wrote:
>> On 2/8/2016 1:30 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
>>> ACPI 6.1 clarified that multi-interface dimms require multiple control
>>> region entries (DCRs) per dimm.  Previously we were assuming that a
>>> control region is only present when block-data-windows are present.
>>
>> We need to give this a quick test with NVDIMM-N because those types of
>> NVDIMMs have control regions without block-data-windows.  We've fixed
>> bugs related to that assumption a couple of times.
>
> I can't test the conditions for which these changes were made but the
> code continues to work on my NVDIMM-N system where we have control
> regions w/o block-data windows.
>

Nice, thanks for the test report!  For my part I verified that the
implementation passes the original plus the modified unit test as
updated in [PATCH 3/3].

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 14+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2016-02-08 20:37 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2016-02-08 18:30 [PATCH 0/3] ACPI 6.1 NFIT Compatibility Dan Williams
2016-02-08 18:30 ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 18:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] nfit: fix multi-interface dimm handling, acpi6.1 compatibility Dan Williams
2016-02-08 18:30   ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 19:10   ` Linda Knippers
2016-02-08 19:10     ` Linda Knippers
2016-02-08 20:23     ` Linda Knippers
2016-02-08 20:23       ` Linda Knippers
2016-02-08 20:37       ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 20:37         ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 18:31 ` [PATCH 2/3] nfit, tools/testing/nvdimm: add format interface code definitions Dan Williams
2016-02-08 18:31   ` Dan Williams
2016-02-08 18:31 ` [PATCH 3/3] nfit, tools/testing/nvdimm: test multiple control regions per-dimm Dan Williams
2016-02-08 18:31   ` Dan Williams

This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.