From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Pali =?utf-8?q?Roh=C3=A1r?= Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/16] Common Dell SMBIOS API Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 22:04:32 +0100 Message-ID: <201602082204.32958@pali> References: <1453472848-3118-1-git-send-email-kernel@kempniu.pl> <20160208192920.GA10110@kroah.com> <20160208204646.GQ1779@malice.jf.intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="nextPart5623993.q72nXXMmEq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <20160208204646.GQ1779@malice.jf.intel.com> Sender: platform-driver-x86-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Darren Hart Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman , =?utf-8?q?Micha=C5=82_K=C4=99pie=C5=84?= , Matthew Garrett , Richard Purdie , Jacek Anaszewski , platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org --nextPart5623993.q72nXXMmEq Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Monday 08 February 2016 21:46:46 Darren Hart wrote: > Pali, are you happy enough with this to add your reviewed-by? There was dicussion about dell-smbios API which you probably missed in tons of other emails. It has subject: "[PATCH 01/14] dell-laptop: extract SMBIOS-related code to a separate modul= e" And you can find it in archive at: http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-leds/msg05379.html I wanted to hear your opinion about this API and I'm not 100% fine with it but on other side it is not easy to design better... Maybe you could have better idea. =2D-=20 Pali Roh=C3=A1r pali.rohar@gmail.com --nextPart5623993.q72nXXMmEq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Description: This is a digitally signed message part. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iEYEABECAAYFAla5AuAACgkQi/DJPQPkQ1LzHACdFEHdbVl4mz4h4ZnDbCBykjHr OYYAoJOylyg73vcTTlDAT6v2yHcG06j0 =pZGG -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --nextPart5623993.q72nXXMmEq--