From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Tue, 9 Feb 2016 12:38:26 +0100 From: Henning Schild Message-ID: <20160209123826.2add02cc@md1em3qc> In-Reply-To: <20160208195533.24C19384496@gemini.denx.de> References: <20160208092941.6f1044da@md1em3qc> <20160208090702.GA29803@hermes.click-hack.org> <20160208101810.7aec631a@md1em3qc> <56B87392.8040703@web.de> <20160208123757.GC29803@hermes.click-hack.org> <20160208140259.66e5dc7f@md1em3qc> <20160208195533.24C19384496@gemini.denx.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Xenomai] mailinglist write access for non-subscribers List-Id: Discussions about the Xenomai project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Wolfgang Denk Cc: Gilles Chanteperdrix , Jan Kiszka , Xenomai On Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:55:33 +0100 Wolfgang Denk wrote: > Dear Henning, > > In message <20160208140259.66e5dc7f@md1em3qc> you wrote: > > > > > Some kernel mailing lists are "subscriber only" too, probably for > > > the same reason (the linux arm kernel mailing list for instance). > > > People have complained about it, but so far it does not seem to > > > be a problem for the participants to the Linux ARM community. > > I can comment a bit on this; my experience comes from the U-Boot > mailing list, which currently has some 2,800+ subscribers, and usually > way over 100 messages per day. > > > I doubt anyone would want to be a manual non-spam-filter. Without > > checking we can assume there is way more spam than content, even > > talking about all the list-traffic. > > U-Boot has always been a subcriber-only list. The number of messages > that get caught for moderation is small enough that it is not a > time-consuming task. But i guess you filter out spam before mail enters mailman, hence the low moderation effort. > Please note that the moderator has many options, including to > permanently ACK addresses, so if cross-posting from for example LKML > should be a problem, you can always just permanently ACK such > addresses when they get stuck in moderation for upon the first > posting. This is minimal work, and the poster does not have to > subscribe. > > Our experience with moderation has always been positive, and we never > really considered to turn this off. > > > Best regards, > > Wolfgang Denk >