On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 09:36:20AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> * Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> [160211 07:54]:

> > This does sound like there's been a change in the interface compared to
> > what users are actually doing - is this an actual problem or is it just
> > a divergence from docs?

> It's an actual problem at least on omaps as the omap_device code
> is very picky about the hardware state.

> Depending how the PM runtime is implemented, it may be a problem
> for some other cases too.

Or people just aren't testing mainline that well (if this is broken in
v4.5 that suggests nobody noticed in -next) - do you know when this
broke?  It really seems like we may need to spin round on how this is
deployed.