From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk ([195.92.253.2]:53992 "EHLO ZenIV.linux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753131AbcBTNgy (ORCPT ); Sat, 20 Feb 2016 08:36:54 -0500 Date: Sat, 20 Feb 2016 13:36:51 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Mike Marshall Cc: Martin Brandenburg , Linus Torvalds , linux-fsdevel , Stephen Rothwell Subject: Re: Orangefs ABI documentation Message-ID: <20160220133651.GG17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> References: <20160218205206.GW17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20160219002539.GX17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> <20160219222221.GB17997@ZenIV.linux.org.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Feb 20, 2016 at 07:14:26AM -0500, Mike Marshall wrote: > Your orangefs-untested branch has 5625087 commits. My "current" branch > has 5625087 commits. In each all of the commit signatures match, except > for the most recent 15 commits. The last 15 commits in my "current" > branch were made from your orangefs-untested branch with "git format-patch" > and applied to my "current" branch with "git am -s". "git log -p" shows that > my most recent 15 commits differ from your most recent 15 commits by > the addition of my "sign off" line. *blinks* *checks* OK, ignore what I asked, then. Looks like I'd screwed up checking last time. > I will absolutely update my kernel.org for-next branch with the procedure you > outlined, because you said so. > > I wish I understood it better, though... I can only guess at this point that > the procedure you outlined will do some desirable thing to git metadata...? None whatsoever, ignore it.