From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Petazzoni Date: Sun, 21 Feb 2016 00:12:47 +0100 Subject: [Buildroot] [PATCH v2 10/18] erlang-p1_stun: bump to version 0.9.0 In-Reply-To: References: <1454443064-14269-1-git-send-email-fhunleth@troodon-software.com> <1454443064-14269-11-git-send-email-fhunleth@troodon-software.com> <20160220233043.2be4fa0c@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20160221001247.1f188600@free-electrons.com> List-Id: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit To: buildroot@busybox.net Hello, On Sat, 20 Feb 2016 18:09:20 -0500, Frank Hunleth wrote: > Yes, I generally have the same preference. In the Erlang world, the > style is to use underscores since module names can be represented as > atoms. In theory, you can quote atoms if you want them to have > hyphens, but it doesn't look pretty. In the end, I don't think that it > bothers me either way, so I'm happy to leave it as is. Ok, fine. > >> config BR2_PACKAGE_ERLANG_P1_STUN > >> - bool "erlang-p1-stun" > >> - select BR2_PACKAGE_ERLANG_P1_TLS > >> + bool "erlang-p1_stun" > >> + select BR2_PACKAGE_ERLANG_FAST_TLS > > > > Build testing has shown that BR2_PACKAGE_ERLANG_FAST_TLS was not the > > proper dependency, and instead keeping BR2_PACKAGE_ERLANG_P1_TLS was > > the right solution. Could you double check why you switched to > > fast_tls ? > > This was a mistake on my part. I fixed it in a patch that I hadn't > sent to the list, so thanks for fixing that for me. So, is the fast_tls package still useful? Thomas -- Thomas Petazzoni, CTO, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com