On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:52:38PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > Add sPAPR specific CPU core device that is based on generic CPU core device. > Creating this core device will result in creation of all the CPU thread > devices that are part of this core. > > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao Looks good overall, a few minor points below. > --- > hw/ppc/Makefile.objs | 1 + > hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c | 210 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h | 32 ++++++ > 3 files changed, 243 insertions(+) > create mode 100644 hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c > create mode 100644 include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h > > diff --git a/hw/ppc/Makefile.objs b/hw/ppc/Makefile.objs > index c1ffc77..5cc6608 100644 > --- a/hw/ppc/Makefile.objs > +++ b/hw/ppc/Makefile.objs > @@ -4,6 +4,7 @@ obj-y += ppc.o ppc_booke.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PSERIES) += spapr.o spapr_vio.o spapr_events.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PSERIES) += spapr_hcall.o spapr_iommu.o spapr_rtas.o > obj-$(CONFIG_PSERIES) += spapr_pci.o spapr_rtc.o spapr_drc.o spapr_rng.o > +obj-$(CONFIG_PSERIES) += spapr_cpu_core.o > ifeq ($(CONFIG_PCI)$(CONFIG_PSERIES)$(CONFIG_LINUX), yyy) > obj-y += spapr_pci_vfio.o > endif > diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..c44eb61 > --- /dev/null > +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.c > @@ -0,0 +1,210 @@ > +/* > + * sPAPR CPU core device, acts as container of CPU thread devices. > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2016 Bharata B Rao > + * > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later. > + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory. > + */ > +#include "hw/cpu/core.h" > +#include "hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h" > +#include "hw/ppc/spapr.h" > +#include "hw/boards.h" > +#include "qemu/error-report.h" > +#include "qapi/visitor.h" > +#include > + > +static int spapr_cpu_core_realize_child(Object *child, void *opaque) > +{ > + Error **errp = opaque; > + > + object_property_set_bool(child, true, "realized", errp); > + if (*errp) { > + return 1; > + } > + return 0; > +} > + > +static void spapr_cpu_core_realize(DeviceState *dev, Error **errp) > +{ > + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(OBJECT(dev)); > + sPAPRMachineState *spapr = SPAPR_MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()); > + Error *local_err = NULL; > + > + if (!core->nr_threads) { > + error_setg(errp, "nr_threads property can't be 0"); > + return; > + } > + > + if (!core->cpu_model) { > + error_setg(errp, "cpu_model property isn't set"); > + return; > + } > + > + /* > + * TODO: If slot isn't specified, plug this core into > + * an existing empty slot. > + */ > + if (!core->slot) { > + error_setg(errp, "slot property isn't set"); > + return; > + } > + > + object_property_set_link(OBJECT(spapr), OBJECT(core), core->slot, > + &local_err); > + if (local_err) { > + error_propagate(errp, local_err); > + return; > + } > + > + object_child_foreach(OBJECT(dev), spapr_cpu_core_realize_child, errp); > +} > + > +/* > + * This creates the CPU threads for a given @core. > + * > + * In order to create the threads, we need two inputs - number of > + * threads and the cpu_model. These are set as core object's properties. > + * When both of them become available/set, this routine will be called from > + * either property's set handler to create the threads. > + * > + * TODO: Dependence of threads creation on two properties is resulting > + * in this not-so-clean way of creating threads from either of the > + * property setters based on the order in which they get set. Check if > + * this can be handled in a better manner. > + */ > +static void spapr_cpu_core_create_threads(sPAPRCPUCore *core, Error **errp) > +{ > + int i; > + > + for (i = 0; i < core->nr_threads; i++) { > + char id[32]; > + char type[32]; > + > + snprintf(type, sizeof(type), "%s-%s", core->cpu_model, > + TYPE_POWERPC_CPU); I think you want to use cpu_class_by_name() rather than explicitly constructing the class name here. > + object_initialize(&core->threads[i], sizeof(core->threads[i]), type); > + > + snprintf(id, sizeof(id), "thread[%d]", i); > + object_property_add_child(OBJECT(core), id, OBJECT(&core->threads[i]), > + errp); > + } > +} > + > +static char *spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_slot(Object *obj, Error **errp) > +{ > + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj); > + > + return core->slot; > +} > + > +static void spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_slot(Object *obj, const char *val, > + Error **errp) > +{ > + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj); > + > + core->slot = g_strdup(val); > +} > + > +static char *spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_cpu_model(Object *obj, Error **errp) > +{ > + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj); > + > + return core->cpu_model; > +} > + > +static void spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_cpu_model(Object *obj, const char *val, > + Error **errp) > +{ > + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj); > + MachineState *machine = MACHINE(qdev_get_machine()); > + > + /* > + * cpu_model can't be different from what is specified with -cpu > + */ > + if (strcmp(val, machine->cpu_model)) { > + error_setg(errp, "cpu_model should be %s", machine->cpu_model); > + return; > + } I'm not sure if this is the right place to test this. Possibly it should be tested in the machine hotplug handler instead. > + core->cpu_model = g_strdup(val); > + if (core->nr_threads && core->cpu_model) { > + spapr_cpu_core_create_threads(core, errp); > + } > +} > + > +static void spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_nr_threads(Object *obj, Visitor *v, > + const char *name, void *opaque, > + Error **errp) > +{ > + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj); > + int64_t value = core->nr_threads; > + > + visit_type_int(v, name, &value, errp); > +} > + > +static void spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_nr_threads(Object *obj, Visitor *v, > + const char *name, void *opaque, > + Error **errp) > +{ > + sPAPRCPUCore *core = SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj); > + Error *local_err = NULL; > + int64_t value; > + > + visit_type_int(v, name, &value, &local_err); > + if (local_err) { > + error_propagate(errp, local_err); > + return; > + } > + > + /* Allow only homogeneous configuration */ > + if (value != smp_threads) { > + error_setg(errp, "nr_threads should be %d", smp_threads); > + return; > + } Likewise, not sure if this is the right place for this check. > + core->nr_threads = value; > + core->threads = g_malloc0(core->nr_threads * sizeof(PowerPCCPU)); > + > + if (core->nr_threads && core->cpu_model) { > + spapr_cpu_core_create_threads(core, errp); > + } > +} > + > +static void spapr_cpu_core_instance_init(Object *obj) > +{ > + object_property_add(obj, "nr_threads", "int", > + spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_nr_threads, > + spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_nr_threads, > + NULL, NULL, NULL); > + object_property_add_str(obj, "cpu_model", > + spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_cpu_model, > + spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_cpu_model, > + NULL); > + object_property_add_str(obj, "slot", > + spapr_cpu_core_prop_get_slot, > + spapr_cpu_core_prop_set_slot, > + NULL); > +} > + > +static void spapr_cpu_core_class_init(ObjectClass *oc, void *data) > +{ > + DeviceClass *dc = DEVICE_CLASS(oc); > + > + dc->realize = spapr_cpu_core_realize; > +} > + > +static const TypeInfo spapr_cpu_core_type_info = { > + .name = TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE, > + .parent = TYPE_CPU_CORE, > + .instance_init = spapr_cpu_core_instance_init, > + .instance_size = sizeof(sPAPRCPUCore), > + .class_init = spapr_cpu_core_class_init, > +}; > + > +static void spapr_cpu_core_register_types(void) > +{ > + type_register_static(&spapr_cpu_core_type_info); > +} > + > +type_init(spapr_cpu_core_register_types) > diff --git a/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h > new file mode 100644 > index 0000000..ed9bc7f > --- /dev/null > +++ b/include/hw/ppc/spapr_cpu_core.h > @@ -0,0 +1,32 @@ > +/* > + * sPAPR CPU core device. > + * > + * Copyright (C) 2016 Bharata B Rao > + * > + * This work is licensed under the terms of the GNU GPL, version 2 or later. > + * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory. > + */ > +#ifndef HW_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_H > +#define HW_SPAPR_CPU_CORE_H > + > +#include "hw/qdev.h" > +#include "hw/cpu/core.h" > + > +#define TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE "spapr-cpu-core" > +#define SPAPR_CPU_CORE(obj) \ > + OBJECT_CHECK(sPAPRCPUCore, (obj), TYPE_SPAPR_CPU_CORE) > + > +typedef struct sPAPRCPUCore { > + /*< private >*/ > + DeviceState parent_obj; > + > + /*< public >*/ > + int nr_threads; > + char *cpu_model; I think this might be better as an ObjectClass *, rather than a string. It avoids strdup()ing above, and works a bit more nicely with cpu_class_by_name(). > + char *slot; > + PowerPCCPU *threads; > +} sPAPRCPUCore; > + > +#define SPAPR_CPU_CORE_SLOT_PROP "slot" > + > +#endif -- David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson