From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35044) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aah7V-0003aD-09 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 05:01:35 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aah7R-0003KU-CX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 05:01:32 -0500 Received: from e23smtp03.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.145]:49670) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1aah7Q-0003KA-QF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 01 Mar 2016 05:01:29 -0500 Received: from localhost by e23smtp03.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Tue, 1 Mar 2016 20:01:23 +1000 Date: Tue, 1 Mar 2016 15:30:23 +0530 From: Bharata B Rao Message-ID: <20160301100022.GL5756@in.ibm.com> References: <1456417362-20652-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1456417362-20652-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v0 0/6] Core based CPU hotplug for PowerPC sPAPR Reply-To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: mjrosato@linux.vnet.ibm.com, thuth@redhat.com, pkrempa@redhat.com, ehabkost@redhat.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, armbru@redhat.com, agraf@suse.de, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, pbonzini@redhat.com, imammedo@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, afaerber@suse.de, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 09:52:36PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > Hi, > > This is an attempt to implement CPU hotplug for PowerPC sPAPR based on > the approach suggested by Andreas. While I say that, I should also explicitly > add that I have tried to follow Andreas' suggestions to the best of my > understanding and hence there could be bits which are still not > as per expectations. > > I have tried to model this similarly to what Andreas did for x86 an year back at > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-03/msg04858.html Andreas - Do you have any comments on this implementation ? Is it worth pursuing further in your view ? Regards, Bharata.