From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from torres.zugschlus.de ([85.214.131.164]:39396 "EHLO torres.zugschlus.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933806AbcCONqF (ORCPT ); Tue, 15 Mar 2016 09:46:05 -0400 Received: from mh by torres.zugschlus.de with local (Exim 4.84) (envelope-from ) id 1afpIQ-0002Lj-So for linux-btrfs@vger.kernel.org; Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:46:02 +0100 Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 14:46:02 +0100 From: Marc Haber To: Btrfs BTRFS Subject: Re: New file system with same issue Message-ID: <20160315134602.GQ2334@torres.zugschlus.de> References: <20160227211450.GS26042@torres.zugschlus.de> <20160305143934.GE1902@torres.zugschlus.de> <20160313115809.GQ2334@torres.zugschlus.de> <20160314120703.GD2334@torres.zugschlus.de> <56E6B312.30903@googlemail.com> <20160314201306.GH2334@torres.zugschlus.de> <56E7E96E.6080301@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 In-Reply-To: <56E7E96E.6080301@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 11:52:30AM +0100, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > On 03/14/16 21:13, Marc Haber wrote: > > Do I need to wait for clear_cache to finish, like until I see disk > > usage dropping? > > The cache isn't that big, so you won't see a huge drop. Just use the > disk normally for a few minutes, after some time the cache will be > written out again. Is it necessary to actually cause activity on the file system or is it ok to just let it sit there for an hour or so? Greetings Marc -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Marc Haber | "I don't trust Computers. They | Mailadresse im Header Leimen, Germany | lose things." Winona Ryder | Fon: *49 6224 1600402 Nordisch by Nature | How to make an American Quilt | Fax: *49 6224 1600421