All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org,
	takahiro.akashi@linaro.org, will.deacon@arm.com,
	stable@vger.kernel.org, stable-commits@vger.kernel.org,
	sudeep.holla@arm.com
Subject: Re: Patch "arm64: kernel: pause/unpause function graph tracer in cpu_suspend()" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree
Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 16:28:03 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160315162803.GA15131@red-moon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160315150439.GA12990@kroah.com>

On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 08:04:39AM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 15, 2016 at 02:08:19PM +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> > Hi Greg,
> > 
> > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 10:54:50PM -0800, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
> > > 
> > > This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
> > > 
> > >     arm64: kernel: pause/unpause function graph tracer in cpu_suspend()
> > > 
> > > to the 4.1-stable tree which can be found at:
> > >     http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
> > > 
> > > The filename of the patch is:
> > >      arm64-kernel-pause-unpause-function-graph-tracer-in-cpu_suspend.patch
> > > and it can be found in the queue-4.1 subdirectory.
> > > 
> > > If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
> > > please let <stable@vger.kernel.org> know about it.
> > 
> > We have just noticed this patch did not make it to 3.18 stable kernel
> > even though it was marked for #3.16+, probably it has slipped through
> > the cracks, please let us know what we can do to get it applied
> > to the 3.18 stable tree.
> 
> Why ask me, I'm not in charge of the 3.18 stable tree?
> 
> Hint, use https://www.kernel.org/category/releases.html in the future...

Ok, sorry for the noise, I will ask Sasha then, I just reused the 4.1
notification to enquire, wrongly.

> And do people really even use 3.18 for arm64 these days?

Yes, that's why I am asking for inclusion, we can debate whether that's
what they should do if I had an option to prevent that.

Thanks,
Lorenzo

      reply	other threads:[~2016-03-15 16:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-01-27  6:54 Patch "arm64: kernel: pause/unpause function graph tracer in cpu_suspend()" has been added to the 4.1-stable tree gregkh
2016-03-15 14:08 ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-03-15 14:07   ` Steven Rostedt
2016-03-15 14:39     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi
2016-03-15 15:04   ` Greg KH
2016-03-15 16:28     ` Lorenzo Pieralisi [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160315162803.GA15131@red-moon \
    --to=lorenzo.pieralisi@arm.com \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=stable-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
    --cc=takahiro.akashi@linaro.org \
    --cc=will.deacon@arm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.