From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Lukas Wunner Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] nouveau: use new vga_switcheroo power domain. Date: Tue, 15 Mar 2016 21:47:41 +0100 Message-ID: <20160315204741.GC27934@wunner.de> References: <1457504045-12738-1-git-send-email-airlied@gmail.com> <1457504045-12738-2-git-send-email-airlied@gmail.com> <20160309144047.GB26158@wunner.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pm-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Dave Airlie Cc: dri-devel , Linux PM list , Linux ACPI , Linux PCI , LKML List-Id: linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org Hi Dave, On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 08:04:26AM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > On 10 March 2016 at 00:40, Lukas Wunner wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 09, 2016 at 04:14:05PM +1000, Dave Airlie wrote: > >> From: Dave Airlie > >> > >> This fixes GPU auto powerdown on the Lenovo W541, > >> since we advertise Windows 2013 to the ACPI layer. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Dave Airlie > >> --- > >> drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_vga.c | 10 +++++++--- > >> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > >> > >> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_vga.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_vga.c > >> index af89c36..b987427f 100644 > >> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_vga.c > >> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_vga.c > >> @@ -101,8 +101,12 @@ nouveau_vga_init(struct nouveau_drm *drm) > >> runtime = true; > >> vga_switcheroo_register_client(dev->pdev, &nouveau_switcheroo_ops, runtime); > >> > >> - if (runtime && nouveau_is_v1_dsm() && !nouveau_is_optimus()) > >> - vga_switcheroo_init_domain_pm_ops(drm->dev->dev, &drm->vga_pm_domain); > >> + if (runtime) { > >> + if (nouveau_is_v1_dsm() && !nouveau_is_optimus()) > > > > The " && !nouveau_is_optimus()" can be dropped because a machine cannot > > have both. Note the "else" in nouveau_dsm_detect(): > > I'm pretty sure I've seen a machine with both in my past, back in the > Vista/Win7 crossover days. Yes, but the code in nouveau_dsm_detect() is such that you'll never have both nouveau_is_v1_dsm() and nouveau_is_optimus() return true. So you can drop the " && !nouveau_is_optimus()". Best regards, Lukas > > > You're calling this unconditionally for all Optimus machines yet > > I assume pre Windows 10 machines lack the PR3 hooks. > > > > Yes and I've confirmed on my older machine that nothing bad happens > doing it unconditionally, > and I couldn't find any bits in the _DSM flags to tell me if I should > do something different. > > Dave.