From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755199AbcCPQjF (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:05 -0400 Received: from 8bytes.org ([81.169.241.247]:40942 "EHLO theia.8bytes.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753458AbcCPQjD (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:39:03 -0400 Date: Wed, 16 Mar 2016 17:39:00 +0100 From: Joerg Roedel To: "Luis R. Rodriguez" Cc: Oded Gabbay , iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, "Linux-Kernel@Vger. Kernel. Org" Subject: Re: [RFT] iommu/amd: use subsys_initcall() on amdv2 iommu Message-ID: <20160316163900.GD2195@8bytes.org> References: <1458079926-18716-1-git-send-email-mcgrof@kernel.org> <20160316101457.GC2195@8bytes.org> <20160316161736.GL1990@wotan.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160316161736.GL1990@wotan.suse.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 05:17:37PM +0100, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 12:16:57PM +0200, Oded Gabbay wrote: > > In theory it should, but I would prefer that it would be tested on > > actual hardware. > > Hence, RFT. Anyone have hardware to test ? And would the other hack > mentioned need to be reverted first ? Yes, the other hack needs to be reverted first to see if this one helps. Joerg