On Mon, Mar 14, 2016 at 05:56:34PM +0100, Cédric Le Goater wrote:
> From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>
> 
> Make sure we give the guest full authorization
> 
> Signed-off-by: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>

So my guess is that this is essential for 2.6 if the other patches
affecting AMOR/AMR go in, but not otherwise.  Is that correct?

> ---
>  target-ppc/translate_init.c | 4 ++++
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/target-ppc/translate_init.c b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> index 68abd847a251..c921d9f53984 100644
> --- a/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> +++ b/target-ppc/translate_init.c
> @@ -8542,6 +8542,7 @@ void cpu_ppc_set_papr(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>  {
>      CPUPPCState *env = &cpu->env;
>      ppc_spr_t *lpcr = &env->spr_cb[SPR_LPCR];
> +    ppc_spr_t *amor = &env->spr_cb[SPR_AMOR];
>  
>      /* PAPR always has exception vectors in RAM not ROM. To ensure this,
>       * MSR[IP] should never be set.
> @@ -8563,6 +8564,9 @@ void cpu_ppc_set_papr(PowerPCCPU *cpu)
>       */
>      env->spr[SPR_LPCR] = lpcr->default_value;
>  
> +    /* Set a full AMOR so guest can use the AMR as it sees fit */
> +    env->spr[SPR_AMOR] = amor->default_value = 0xffffffffffffffffull;
> +
>      /* Tell KVM that we're in PAPR mode */
>      if (kvm_enabled()) {
>          kvmppc_set_papr(cpu);

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson