From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gavin Shan Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 42/45] drivers/of: Rename unflatten_dt_node() Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2016 09:44:21 +1100 Message-ID: <20160317224421.GA9185@gwshan> References: <1455680668-23298-1-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1455680668-23298-43-git-send-email-gwshan@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20160219031655.GA10818@gwshan> <20160308005633.GA30023@gwshan> Reply-To: Gavin Shan Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-pci-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Rob Herring Cc: Gavin Shan , linuxppc-dev , "linux-pci@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , Benjamin Herrenschmidt , Michael Ellerman , aik@ozlabs.ru, dja@axtens.net, Bjorn Helgaas , Grant Likely List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 08:31:16AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote: >On Mon, Mar 7, 2016 at 6:56 PM, Gavin Shan wrote: >> On Tue, Mar 01, 2016 at 08:40:12PM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >>>On Thu, Feb 18, 2016 at 9:16 PM, Gavin Shan wrote: >>>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 08:59:53AM -0600, Rob Herring wrote: >>>>>On Tue, Feb 16, 2016 at 9:44 PM, Gavin Shan wrote: >>>>>> This renames unflatten_dt_node() to unflatten_dt_nodes() as it >>>>>> populates multiple device nodes from FDT blob. No logical changes >>>>>> introduced. >>>>>> >>>>>> Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan >>>>>> --- >>>>>> drivers/of/fdt.c | 14 +++++++------- >>>>>> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) >>>>> >>>>>Acked-by: Rob Herring >>>>> >>>>>I'm happy to take patches 40-42 for 4.6 if the rest of the series >>>>>doesn't go in given they fix a separate problem. I just need to know >>>>>soon (or at least they need to go into -next soon). >>>>> >>>> >>>> Thanks for quick response, Rob. It depends how much comments I will >>>> receive for the powerpc/powernv part. Except that, all parts including >>>> this one have been ack'ed. I can discuss it with Michael Ellerman. >>>> By the way, how soon you need the decision to merge 40-42? If that's >>>> one or two weeks later, I don't think the reivew on the whole series >>>> can be done. >>> >>>Well, it's been 2 weeks now. I need to know this week. >>> >>>> Also, I think you probably can merge 40-44 as they're all about >>>> fdt.c. If they can be merged at one time, I needn't bother (cc) >>>> you again if I need send a updated revision. Thanks for your >>>> review. >>> >>>I did not include 43 and 44 as they are only needed for the rest of your series. >>> >> >> Rob, sorry for late reponse. I really expect this series to be merged to 4.6 and >> I was checking reviewers' bandwidth to review it. Unfortunately, I didn't receive >> any comments except yours until now. That means this series has to miss 4.6. Please >> pick/merge 41 and 42 if no body has objection. Thanks again for your time on this. > >Too late for 4.6. > Yeah, Sorry about that, Rob. Thanks, Gavin