From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752045AbcCUAHF (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:07:05 -0400 Received: from LGEAMRELO11.lge.com ([156.147.23.51]:46471 "EHLO lgeamrelo11.lge.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751390AbcCUAHD (ORCPT ); Sun, 20 Mar 2016 20:07:03 -0400 X-Original-SENDERIP: 156.147.1.126 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com X-Original-SENDERIP: 10.177.222.33 X-Original-MAILFROM: byungchul.park@lge.com Date: Mon, 21 Mar 2016 09:06:47 +0900 From: Byungchul Park To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Andrew Morton , Jan Kara , Petr Mladek , Tejun Heo , Tetsuo Handa , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Sergey Senozhatsky , Jan Kara Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v5 1/2] printk: Make printk() completely async Message-ID: <20160321000647.GP5220@X58A-UD3R> References: <1458483191-3596-1-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <1458483191-3596-2-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1458483191-3596-2-git-send-email-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Sun, Mar 20, 2016 at 11:13:10PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > @@ -1748,13 +1872,42 @@ asmlinkage int vprintk_emit(int facility, int level, > dict, dictlen, text, text_len); > } > > + /* > + * By default we print message to console asynchronously so that kernel > + * doesn't get stalled due to slow serial console. That can lead to > + * softlockups, lost interrupts, or userspace timing out under heavy > + * printing load. > + * > + * However we resort to synchronous printing of messages during early > + * boot, when synchronous printing was explicitly requested by > + * kernel parameter, or when console_verbose() was called to print > + * everything during panic / oops. > + */ > + if (!sync_print) { > + if (in_sched) { > + /* > + * @in_sched messages may come too early, when we don't > + * yet have @printk_kthread. We can't print deferred > + * messages directly, because this may deadlock, route > + * them via IRQ context. > + */ > + __this_cpu_or(printk_pending, > + PRINTK_PENDING_OUTPUT); > + irq_work_queue(this_cpu_ptr(&wake_up_klogd_work)); > + } else if (printk_kthread && !in_panic) { > + /* Offload printing to a schedulable context. */ > + wake_up_process(printk_kthread); It will not print the "lockup suspected" message at all, for e.g. rq->lock, p->pi_lock and any locks which are used within wake_up_process(). Furtheremore, any printk() within wake_up_process() cannot work at all, as well. It's too bad to use any functions potentially including printk() inside of this critical section. > + } else { > + sync_print = true; > + } > + } > + > logbuf_cpu = UINT_MAX; > raw_spin_unlock(&logbuf_lock); > lockdep_on(); > local_irq_restore(flags);