From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Chris Dunlop Subject: Re: [ceph-users] v0.94.6 Hammer released Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2016 10:39:32 +1100 Message-ID: <20160322233932.GA32084@onthe.net.au> References: <20160302010625.GA10914@onthe.net.au> <1456913706999.87255@croc.ru> <56D6CF42.7080909@dachary.org> <20160310000006.GA14061@onthe.net.au> <20160316232029.GA22451@onthe.net.au> <011EEA5C-6A6B-489B-AB20-6EDEE2F55AFE@ebay.com> <20160317014314.GA25617@onthe.net.au> <20160322224923.GA31017@onthe.net.au> <56F1D1D3.8070207@dachary.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Return-path: Received: from smtp1.onthe.net.au ([203.22.196.249]:37000 "EHLO smtp1.onthe.net.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752625AbcCVXjf (ORCPT ); Tue, 22 Mar 2016 19:39:35 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <56F1D1D3.8070207@dachary.org> Sender: ceph-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Loic Dachary Cc: "Chen, Xiaoxi" , Nathan Cutler , M Ranga Swami Reddy , Wei-Chung Cheng , "ceph-devel@vger.kernel.org" , "ceph-users@ceph.com" Hi Lo=C3=AFc, On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 12:14:27AM +0100, Loic Dachary wrote: > On 22/03/2016 23:49, Chris Dunlop wrote: >> Hi Stable Release Team for v0.94, >>=20 >> Let's try again... Any news on a release of v0.94.6 for debian wheez= y (bpo70)? >=20 > I don't think publishing a debian wheezy backport for v0.94.6 is plan= ned. Maybe it's a good opportunity to initiate a community effort ? Wou= ld you like to work with me on this ? It's my understanding, from statements by both Sage and yourself, that existing OS'es would continue to be supported in the stable series, e.g= =2E: On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 06:32:18PM +0700, Loic Dachary wrote: > I think you misread what Sage wrote : "The intention was to continue > building stable releases (0.94.x) on the old list of supported platf= orms > (which inclues 12.04 and el6)". In other words, the old OS'es are st= ill > supported. Their absence is a glitch in the release process that wil= l be > fixed. "The old OS'es" that were being supported up to v0.94.5 includes debian wheezy. It would be quite surprising and unexpected to drop support for= an OS in the middle of a stable series. If that is indeed what's happening, and it's not just an oversight, I'd prefer to put my efforts into moving to a supported OS rather than keep= ing the older OS on life support. Just to be clear, I understand it is quite a burden maintaining release= s for old OSes, I'm only voicing mild surprise and a touch of regret: I'm ver= y happy with the Ceph project! Cheers, Chris, OnTheNet -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe ceph-devel" i= n the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html