From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:40960 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756058AbcC2Hk2 (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Mar 2016 03:40:28 -0400 Date: Tue, 29 Mar 2016 00:40:26 -0700 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Bob Peterson Cc: Christoph Hellwig , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jan Kara , Al Viro , Dave Chinner Subject: Re: [vfs PATCH v3 1/4] VFS: move iomap from exportfs.h to iomap.h Message-ID: <20160329074026.GD8568@infradead.org> References: <1457122300-28514-1-git-send-email-rpeterso@redhat.com> <1457122300-28514-2-git-send-email-rpeterso@redhat.com> <20160315072912.GE11669@infradead.org> <690524895.44280573.1459194784327.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <690524895.44280573.1459194784327.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 03:53:04PM -0400, Bob Peterson wrote: > Thanks for the link. I'm very pleased to see you're working on the > multi-page write and iomap stuff. I'd like to see these patches go > forward and I'll build my fiemap stuff off of them. > > Does it make sense to split the first two vfs-related patches from the > others that are more xfs related? I didn't see these patches appear on > linux-fsdevel or lkml, so I assume they're only on the xfs list currently? For now I'm not sure the infrastructure will stay in the generic code or in XFS, so for the first round I just wanted to ask for XFS feedback.