From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree
Date: Wed, 30 Mar 2016 03:30:31 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160330103031.GC4287@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20160330113214.4110cd63@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 11:32:14AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:
>
> kernel/rcu/tree.c
>
> between commit:
>
> abedf8e2419f ("rcu: Use simple wait queues where possible in rcutree")
>
> from Linus' tree and commit:
>
> 08cace5914ea ("DIAGS: Crude exploratory hack")
>
> from the rcu tree.
>
> I fixed it up (I used the rcu tree version) and can carry the fix as
> necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any
> non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer
> when your tree is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider
> cooperating with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any
> particularly complex conflicts.
>
> I really don't think that that rcu tree patch should be in linux-next,
> right?
Right you are! I will rework to get the diagnostics out of your way.
-Might- have helped find one of the bugs, but don't look now...
Thanx, Paul
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-03-30 10:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-03-30 0:32 linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with Linus' tree Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-30 10:30 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2022-10-17 22:41 Stephen Rothwell
2022-10-18 18:38 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-08 4:12 Stephen Rothwell
2022-07-08 15:23 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-12 0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-12 1:01 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-06-18 3:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-18 3:49 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-18 14:48 ` Paul E. McKenney
2018-05-14 3:46 Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-15 17:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-26 3:00 Stephen Rothwell
2017-09-26 3:26 ` Paul E. McKenney
2017-09-26 3:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-08 0:46 Stephen Rothwell
2017-03-08 0:56 ` Stephen Rothwell
2016-03-30 0:23 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-29 3:06 Stephen Rothwell
2012-11-29 22:12 ` Paul E. McKenney
2012-08-06 2:31 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27 6:04 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27 12:20 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2011-09-27 5:14 Stephen Rothwell
2011-09-27 13:14 ` Borislav Petkov
2010-10-06 2:38 Stephen Rothwell
2010-10-06 4:17 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160330103031.GC4287@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.