All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Waiman Long <Waiman.Long@hpe.com>
Cc: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@mit.edu>,
	Andreas Dilger <adilger.kernel@dilger.ca>,
	Christoph Lameter <cl@linux.com>,
	linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Scott J Norton <scott.norton@hpe.com>,
	Douglas Hatch <doug.hatch@hpe.com>,
	Toshimitsu Kani <toshi.kani@hpe.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions
Date: Mon, 4 Apr 2016 12:02:28 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160404160228.GW7822@mtj.duckdns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1459566578-30221-3-git-send-email-Waiman.Long@hpe.com>

Hello,

On Fri, Apr 01, 2016 at 11:09:37PM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
...
> +struct percpu_stats {
> +	unsigned long __percpu *stats;

I'm not sure ulong is the best choice here.  Atomic reads on 32bit are
nice but people often need 64bit counters for stats.  It probably is a
better idea to use u64_stats_sync.

> +/*
> + * Reset the all statistics counts to 0 in the percpu_stats structure

Proper function description please.

> + */
> +static inline void percpu_stats_reset(struct percpu_stats *pcs)

Why is this function inline?

> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		unsigned long *pstats =  per_cpu_ptr(pcs->stats, cpu);
                                       ^^
> +		int stat;
> +
> +		for (stat = 0; stat < pcs->nstats; stat++, pstats++)
> +			*pstats = 0;
> +	}
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * If a statistics count is in the middle of being updated, it
> +	 * is possible that the above clearing may not work. So we need
> +	 * to double check again to make sure that the counters are really
> +	 * cleared. Still there is a still a very small chance that the
> +	 * second clearing does not work.
> +	 */
> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
> +		unsigned long *pstats =  per_cpu_ptr(pcs->stats, cpu);
> +		int stat;
> +
> +		for (stat = 0; stat < pcs->nstats; stat++, pstats++)
> +			if (*pstats)
> +				*pstats = 0;
> +	}

I don't think this is acceptable.

> +}
> +
> +static inline int percpu_stats_init(struct percpu_stats *pcs, int num)
> +{
> +	pcs->nstats = num;
> +	pcs->stats  = __alloc_percpu(sizeof(unsigned long) * num,
> +				     __alignof__(unsigned long));
> +	if (!pcs->stats)
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +
> +	percpu_stats_reset(pcs);
> +	return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static inline void percpu_stats_destroy(struct percpu_stats *pcs)
> +{
> +	free_percpu(pcs->stats);
> +	pcs->stats  = NULL;
> +	pcs->nstats = 0;
> +}

Why inline the above functions?

> +static inline void
> +__percpu_stats_add(struct percpu_stats *pcs, int stat, int cnt)
> +{
> +	unsigned long *pstat;
> +
> +	if ((unsigned int)stat >= pcs->nstats)
> +		return;

This is a critical bug.  Please don't fail silently.  BUG_ON(),
please.

> +	preempt_disable();
> +	pstat = this_cpu_ptr(&pcs->stats[stat]);
> +	*pstat += cnt;
> +	preempt_enable();
> +}

this_cpu_add() is atomic w.r.t. local operations.

> +static inline unsigned long
> +percpu_stats_sum(struct percpu_stats *pcs, int stat)
> +{
> +	int cpu;
> +	unsigned long sum = 0;
> +
> +	if ((unsigned int)stat >= pcs->nstats)
> +		return sum;

Ditto.

> +	for_each_possible_cpu(cpu)
> +		sum += per_cpu(pcs->stats[stat], cpu);
> +	return sum;
> +}

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

  parent reply	other threads:[~2016-04-04 16:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-02  3:09 [PATCH 0/3] ext4: Improve parallel I/O performance on NVDIMM Waiman Long
2016-04-02  3:09 ` [PATCH 1/3] ext4: Pass in DIO_SKIP_DIO_COUNT flag if inode_dio_begin() called Waiman Long
2016-04-02  3:09 ` [PATCH 2/3] percpu_stats: Simple per-cpu statistics count helper functions Waiman Long
2016-04-04  7:36   ` Nikolay Borisov
2016-04-04 17:11     ` Waiman Long
2016-04-04 19:09       ` Christoph Lameter
2016-04-06 21:53         ` Waiman Long
2016-04-04 16:02   ` Tejun Heo [this message]
2016-04-06 19:52     ` Waiman Long
2016-04-06 21:51     ` Waiman Long
2016-04-06 22:54       ` Tejun Heo
2016-04-07 15:58         ` Waiman Long
2016-04-07 16:06           ` Tejun Heo
2016-04-07 18:52             ` Waiman Long
2016-04-07 18:58               ` Tejun Heo
2016-04-07 20:37                 ` Waiman Long
2016-04-07 20:41                   ` Tejun Heo
2016-04-07 21:38                     ` Waiman Long
2016-04-02  3:09 ` [PATCH 3/3] ext4: Make cache hits/misses per-cpu counts Waiman Long

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160404160228.GW7822@mtj.duckdns.org \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=Waiman.Long@hpe.com \
    --cc=adilger.kernel@dilger.ca \
    --cc=cl@linux.com \
    --cc=doug.hatch@hpe.com \
    --cc=linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=scott.norton@hpe.com \
    --cc=toshi.kani@hpe.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.