From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1758078AbcDHJva (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2016 05:51:30 -0400 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([78.46.96.112]:37613 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753459AbcDHJv3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2016 05:51:29 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 11:51:24 +0200 From: Borislav Petkov To: Andy Lutomirski Cc: Andy Lutomirski , "security@kernel.org" , X86 ML , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , Linus Torvalds , Rudolf Marek , Borislav Petkov , stable , Andi Kleen Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 6/7] x86/cpu: Add Erratum 88 detection on AMD Message-ID: <20160408095123.GA29522@pd.tnic> References: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 07, 2016 at 06:40:13PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote: > Ingo, etc: we should probably apply one of those patches with a > -stable tag (to mitigate the otherwise potentially unpleasant > performance regression in here), but I don't really care which one. > Andi's has a name for the bug that seems nicer by one character to me, > but it would have to be (trivally) rebased. I don't care which one as long as the commit message says "erratum 88" somewhere. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. ECO tip #101: Trim your mails when you reply.