From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
To: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
Subject: Re: [RFC 1/4] drm/i915: Move releasing of the GEM request from free to retire/cancel
Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 16:01:08 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160408150108.GC1787@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1460123698-16832-2-git-send-email-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 02:54:55PM +0100, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote:
> From: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
>
> If we move the release of the GEM request (i.e. decoupling it from the
> various lists used for client and context tracking) after it is complete
> (either by the GPU retiring the request, or by the caller cancelling the
> request), we can remove the requirement that the final unreference of
> the GEM request need to be under the struct_mutex.
>
> v2: Execlists as always is badly asymetric and year old patches still
> haven't landed to fix it up.
>
> v3: Extracted, rebased and fixed for GuC. (Tvrtko Ursulin)
After you mentioned the unbalanced, the patches I reordered to fix that
are:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?h=tasklet&id=83dcde26caa26f4113c3e441c3c96c504fd88e13
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?h=tasklet&id=9f386a21d3f28db763102b5c4f97a90bd0dcfd08
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?h=tasklet&id=9afd878e2c9f7825b99dc839c7b5deb553b62e32
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~ickle/linux-2.6/commit/?h=tasklet&id=a842a2b0b7e90148966f35488209c969a9a9da54
-Chris
--
Chris Wilson, Intel Open Source Technology Centre
_______________________________________________
Intel-gfx mailing list
Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/intel-gfx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-08 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-08 13:54 [RFC 0/4] Eliminating the execlist retired request queue Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 13:54 ` [RFC 1/4] drm/i915: Move releasing of the GEM request from free to retire/cancel Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 15:01 ` Chris Wilson [this message]
2016-04-11 9:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 13:54 ` [RFC 2/4] drm/i915/guc: Keep the previous context pinned until the next one has been completed Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 14:37 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-11 8:58 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 13:54 ` [RFC 3/4] drm/i915: Use new i915_gem_object_pin_map for LRC Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 14:40 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-11 9:05 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-11 9:18 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-08 13:54 ` [RFC 4/4] drm/i915: Stop tracking execlists retired requests Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-08 14:57 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-11 9:10 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-11 9:23 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-11 9:26 ` Chris Wilson
2016-04-08 14:08 ` ✗ Fi.CI.BAT: failure for Eliminating the execlist retired request queue Patchwork
2016-04-09 8:03 ` [RFC 0/4] " Chris Wilson
2016-04-11 9:19 ` Tvrtko Ursulin
2016-04-11 10:20 ` Chris Wilson
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20160408150108.GC1787@nuc-i3427.alporthouse.com \
--to=chris@chris-wilson.co.uk \
--cc=Intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.