From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:42033 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758474AbcDHTS5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 8 Apr 2016 15:18:57 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2016 12:18:55 -0700 From: Mark Fasheh To: Holger =?iso-8859-1?Q?Hoffst=E4tte?= Cc: Filipe David Manana , linux-btrfs , Qu Wenruo Subject: Re: WARN_ON in record_root_in_trans() when deleting freshly renamed subvolume Message-ID: <20160408191855.GK2187@wotan.suse.de> Reply-To: Mark Fasheh References: <57068E64.7000408@googlemail.com> <57079B4D.8080304@googlemail.com> <5707ADCB.9090207@googlemail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 In-Reply-To: <5707ADCB.9090207@googlemail.com> Sender: linux-btrfs-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri, Apr 08, 2016 at 03:10:35PM +0200, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > [cc: Mark and Qu] > > On 04/08/16 13:51, Holger Hoffstätte wrote: > > On 04/08/16 13:14, Filipe Manana wrote: > >> Using Chris' for-linus-4.6 branch, which is 4.5-rc6 + all 4.6 btrfs > >> patches, it didn't reproduce here: > > > > Great, that's good to know (sort of :). Thanks also to Liu Bo. > > > >> Are you sure that you are not using some patches not in 4.6? > > We have a bingo! > > Reverting "qgroup: Fix qgroup accounting when creating snapshot" > from last Wednesday immediately fixes the problem. Not surprising, I had some issues testing it out too. I'm pretty sure this patch is corrupting memory, I just haven't found where yet though my educated guess is that the transaction is being reused improperly. --Mark -- Mark Fasheh