From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Ingo Molnar Subject: Re: [PATCH] efi/arm64: don't apply MEMBLOCK_NOMAP to UEFI memory map mapping Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:09:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20160416090910.GA30739@gmail.com> References: <1459323983-9120-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20160331203520.GB2736@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20160415221516.GU2829@codeblueprint.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160415221516.GU2829-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Matt Fleming Cc: Steve Capper , Ard Biesheuvel , Mark Rutland , Mark Langsdorf , Jeremy Linton , "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , Leif Lindholm , Mark Salter , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org * Matt Fleming wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr, at 05:44:02PM, Steve Capper wrote: > > > > Hello, > > Is this going to make it in for 4.6? > > I ran into this issue the other day, and can confirm that Ard's patch > > is helpful. > > Good question. > > Ingo did you send the patch in the last EFI urgent pull request to > Linus yet? I can find it in tip/efi-urgent-for-linus but not in Linus' > tree. I just sent it to Linus. It got delayed a bit because it had an x86/urgent dependency that had to be sent upstream first. (In the future you can avoid such delays by basing EFI urgent fixes on an upstream -rc kernel, not x86/urgent.) Thanks, Ingo From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: mingo@kernel.org (Ingo Molnar) Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 11:09:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] efi/arm64: don't apply MEMBLOCK_NOMAP to UEFI memory map mapping In-Reply-To: <20160415221516.GU2829@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <1459323983-9120-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20160331203520.GB2736@codeblueprint.co.uk> <20160415221516.GU2829@codeblueprint.co.uk> Message-ID: <20160416090910.GA30739@gmail.com> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org * Matt Fleming wrote: > On Fri, 15 Apr, at 05:44:02PM, Steve Capper wrote: > > > > Hello, > > Is this going to make it in for 4.6? > > I ran into this issue the other day, and can confirm that Ard's patch > > is helpful. > > Good question. > > Ingo did you send the patch in the last EFI urgent pull request to > Linus yet? I can find it in tip/efi-urgent-for-linus but not in Linus' > tree. I just sent it to Linus. It got delayed a bit because it had an x86/urgent dependency that had to be sent upstream first. (In the future you can avoid such delays by basing EFI urgent fixes on an upstream -rc kernel, not x86/urgent.) Thanks, Ingo