All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>, git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC 4/6] transport: add refspec list parameters to functions
Date: Tue, 19 Apr 2016 03:14:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20160419071403.GA22577@sigill.intra.peff.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa8kq69i5.fsf@gitster.mtv.corp.google.com>

On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:45:54AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:

> David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com> writes:
> 
> > Add parameters for a list of refspecs to transport_get_remote_refs and
> > get_refs_list.  These parameters are presently unused -- soon, we will
> > use them to implement fetches which only learn about a subset of refs.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: David Turner <dturner@twopensource.com>
> > ---
> 
> What the code tries to do I am more than halfway happy.  It is
> unfortunate that we cannot do this natively without upgrading the
> protocol in a fundamental way, but this is a nice way to work it
> around only for Git-over-HTTP transport without having to break the
> protocol.

I dunno, I am a bit negative on bringing new features to Git-over-HTTP
(which is already less efficient than the other protocols!) without any
plan for supporting them in the other protocols.

I thought Stefan's v2 protocol work looked quite good, but it seems to
have stalled. The hardest part of that topic is figuring out the upgrade
path. But for git-over-http, we can solve that in the same way that
David is passing in the extra refspecs.

So I'd rather see something like:

  1. Support for v2 "capabilities only" initial negotiation, followed
     by ref advertisement.

  2. Support for refspec-limiting capability.

  3. HTTP-only option from client to trigger v2 on the server.

That's still HTTP-specific, but it has a clear path for converging with
the ssh and git protocols eventually, rather than having to support
magic out-of-band capabilities forever.

It does require an extra round of HTTP request/response, though.

-Peff

  reply	other threads:[~2016-04-19  7:14 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 36+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-04-15 19:19 [PATCH/RFC 0/6] fetch with refspec David Turner
2016-04-15 19:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 1/6] http-backend: use argv_array functions David Turner
2016-04-18 18:34   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-19 19:11     ` David Turner
2016-04-15 19:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 2/6] remote-curl.c: fix variable shadowing David Turner
2016-04-18 18:35   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-19 19:14     ` David Turner
2016-04-15 19:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 3/6] http-backend: handle refspec argument David Turner
2016-04-17  1:51   ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-19 18:57     ` David Turner
2016-04-15 19:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 4/6] transport: add refspec list parameters to functions David Turner
2016-04-18 18:45   ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-19  7:14     ` Jeff King [this message]
2016-04-19 18:04       ` Stefan Beller
2016-04-19 20:55       ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-19 21:40       ` David Turner
2016-04-19 23:22         ` Jeff King
2016-04-19 23:43           ` David Turner
2016-04-20  1:17             ` Jeff King
2016-04-20 20:46               ` David Turner
2016-04-20 20:57                 ` Jeff King
2016-04-25 16:44                   ` David Turner
2016-04-25 22:10                     ` Stefan Beller
2016-04-27  3:59                       ` Stefan Beller
2016-04-27  4:11                         ` Jeff King
2016-04-27 15:07                           ` Junio C Hamano
2016-04-29 23:05                         ` David Turner
2016-04-29 23:12                           ` Stefan Beller
2016-04-19 19:31     ` David Turner
2016-04-15 19:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 5/6] fetch: pass refspec to http server David Turner
2016-04-17  2:33   ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-19 21:25     ` David Turner
2016-04-15 19:19 ` [PATCH/RFC 6/6] clone: send refspec for single-branch clones David Turner
2016-04-17  2:36   ` Eric Sunshine
2016-04-19 21:24     ` David Turner
2016-04-15 19:30 ` [PATCH/RFC 0/6] fetch with refspec Stefan Beller

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20160419071403.GA22577@sigill.intra.peff.net \
    --to=peff@peff.net \
    --cc=dturner@twopensource.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=gitster@pobox.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.