From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Matt Fleming Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/9] EFI framebuffer support for ARM and arm64 Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 22:26:57 +0100 Message-ID: <20160422212656.GH2829@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <1459526735-24936-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20160420190224.GC2829@codeblueprint.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160420190224.GC2829-mF/unelCI9GS6iBeEJttW/XRex20P6io@public.gmane.org> Sender: linux-efi-owner-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org To: Ard Biesheuvel Cc: "linux-efi-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org" , "linux-arm-kernel-IAPFreCvJWM7uuMidbF8XUB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org" , Mark Rutland , Will Deacon , David Herrmann , Peter Jones List-Id: linux-efi@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 20 Apr, at 08:02:24PM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr, at 02:51:09PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > Matt: FYI the memremap() patches for ARM that this series (and the > > memory attributes one as well, for that matter) depends on have been > > pulled by Russell and should turn up in -next shortly. That means > > these patches are good to go, as far as I am concerned (unless there > > are remaining concerns?) > > Understood. I don't think there were any remaining concerns but I > haven't reviewed the v3 series yet. I'll do that and get back to you. OK, I've gone through this again. Everything looks very nice. It's queued up for v4.7. From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: matt@codeblueprint.co.uk (Matt Fleming) Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2016 22:26:57 +0100 Subject: [PATCH v3 0/9] EFI framebuffer support for ARM and arm64 In-Reply-To: <20160420190224.GC2829@codeblueprint.co.uk> References: <1459526735-24936-1-git-send-email-ard.biesheuvel@linaro.org> <20160420190224.GC2829@codeblueprint.co.uk> Message-ID: <20160422212656.GH2829@codeblueprint.co.uk> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Wed, 20 Apr, at 08:02:24PM, Matt Fleming wrote: > On Wed, 20 Apr, at 02:51:09PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > > > > Matt: FYI the memremap() patches for ARM that this series (and the > > memory attributes one as well, for that matter) depends on have been > > pulled by Russell and should turn up in -next shortly. That means > > these patches are good to go, as far as I am concerned (unless there > > are remaining concerns?) > > Understood. I don't think there were any remaining concerns but I > haven't reviewed the v3 series yet. I'll do that and get back to you. OK, I've gone through this again. Everything looks very nice. It's queued up for v4.7.