From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: horms@verge.net.au (Simon Horman) Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 10:23:28 +1000 Subject: [GIT PULL] Renesas ARM Based SoC R-Car SYSC Updates for v4.7 In-Reply-To: <4901266.5hHvo6PbjV@wuerfel> References: <4901266.5hHvo6PbjV@wuerfel> Message-ID: <20160425002328.GB30009@verge.net.au> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 11:40:47PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday 21 April 2016 13:44:48 Simon Horman wrote: > > Renesas ARM Based SoC R-Car SYSC Updates for v4.7 > > > > * Add DT bindings for the R-Car System Controller. > > An implementation is intended to follow. > > > > This seems to best fit into next/dt, but we can also stick it into other > branches if it's needed as a dependency. Hi Arnd, Unfortunately this is more complex than I expected when I prepared this pull request though the pull request itself is still correct. There are driver changes that seem to logically fit on top of this pull request. Though strictly speaking I don't believe there are any hard run-time dependencies. Then there are DT changes to enable the new driver that have hard run-time dependencies on the driver changes themselves. I have queued things up as described above and you can see them in the renesas-next-20160422v3-v4.6-rc1 tag of next branch of the renesas tree. I am planning to send corresponding pull requests in the near future. I would be very happy to hear any feedback you have before I take that step.