From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S965105AbcDYUIj (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 16:08:39 -0400 Received: from bombadil.infradead.org ([198.137.202.9]:51387 "EHLO bombadil.infradead.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933523AbcDYUI3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 Apr 2016 16:08:29 -0400 Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 22:08:26 +0200 From: Peter Zijlstra To: "Luck, Tony" Cc: Vikas Shivappa , "Shankar, Ravi V" , "Yu, Fenghua" , "Shivappa, Vikas" , "x86@kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "hpa@zytor.com" , "tglx@linutronix.de" , "mingo@kernel.org" , "Anvin, H Peter" Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/4] perf/x86/cqm: Support cqm/mbm only for perf events Message-ID: <20160425200826.GO3448@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <1461371241-4258-1-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> <1461371241-4258-5-git-send-email-vikas.shivappa@linux.intel.com> <20160425091805.GG3430@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net> <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3A0B21FF@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F3A0B21FF@ORSMSX114.amr.corp.intel.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2012-12-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 04:23:58PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > >> Hence removing support for the parts which are broken rather than > >> pretending to support it and giving incorrect data. > > > > Uh what, how about attempt to fix it? > > No hope to do that by 4.6 release ... so I suggested to Vikas that it would be better to disable > the feature now so users wouldn't be confused by the random numbers that they'll see if > they try to do this. Of course, that might have been useful information to have in the changelog to begin with. But seeing that its been broken for a number of releases I don't see how this is urgent to stuff in this one. I'd instead be more inclined to hurry with Stephanes patches..