From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S1751959AbcDZAoJ (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:44:09 -0400
Received: from mail-pa0-f49.google.com ([209.85.220.49]:34130 "EHLO
	mail-pa0-f49.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1751756AbcDZAoH (ORCPT
	<rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 25 Apr 2016 20:44:07 -0400
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 17:44:00 -0700
From: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <arnaldo.melo@gmail.com>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@gmail.com>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
        Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@gmail.com>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
        Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
        Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>,
        Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
        Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>, He Kuang <hekuang@huawei.com>,
        Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>, Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>,
        Milian Wolff <milian.wolff@kdab.com>,
        Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
        Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
        Vince Weaver <vincent.weaver@maine.edu>,
        Wang Nan <wangnan0@huawei.com>, Zefan Li <lizefan@huawei.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH/RFC v3] perf core: Allow setting up max frame stack depth
 via sysctl
Message-ID: <20160426004358.GA29875@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
References: <20160422221806.GA62857@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
 <20160425161425.GA25218@kernel.org>
 <20160425162706.GB25218@kernel.org>
 <20160425192229.GC25218@kernel.org>
 <20160425200646.GA23875@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
 <20160425201750.GD25218@kernel.org>
 <20160425215947.GA25915@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
 <20160425234138.GA16708@kernel.org>
 <20160426000724.GA28705@ast-mbp.thefacebook.com>
 <20160426002928.GB16708@kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20160426002928.GB16708@kernel.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30)
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 09:29:28PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Em Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:07:26PM -0700, Alexei Starovoitov escreveu:
> > > +	{
> > > +		.procname	= "perf_event_max_stack",
> > > +		.data		= NULL, /* filled in by handler */
> > > +		.maxlen		= sizeof(sysctl_perf_event_max_stack),
> > > +		.mode		= 0644,
> > > +		.proc_handler	= perf_event_max_stack_handler,
> > > +		.extra1		= &zero,
> > > +	},
>  
> > you need to define a max value otherwise perf_callchain_entry__sizeof
> > will overflow. Sure it's root only facility, but still not nice.
> > 1M? Anything above 1M stack frames would be insane anyway.
> > The rest looks good. Thanks!
> 
> Something else? ;-)

all looks good to me. Thanks a bunch!

> 
> commit cd544af4f7fede01cb512d52bb3efe62aa19271d
> Author: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
> Date:   Thu Apr 21 12:28:50 2016 -0300
> 
>     perf core: Allow setting up max frame stack depth via sysctl
>     
>     The default remains 127, which is good for most cases, and not even hit
>     most of the time, but then for some cases, as reported by Brendan, 1024+
>     deep frames are appearing on the radar for things like groovy, ruby.
>     
>     And in some workloads putting a _lower_ cap on this may make sense. One
>     that is per event still needs to be put in place tho.
>     
>     The new file is:
>     
>       # cat /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_stack
>       127
>     
>     Chaging it:
>     
>       # echo 256 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_stack
>       # cat /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_stack
>       256
>     
>     But as soon as there is some event using callchains we get:
>     
>       # echo 512 > /proc/sys/kernel/perf_event_max_stack
>       -bash: echo: write error: Device or resource busy
>       #
>     
>     Because we only allocate the callchain percpu data structures when there
>     is a user, which allows for changing the max easily, its just a matter
>     of having no callchain users at that point.
>     
>     Reported-and-Tested-by: Brendan Gregg <brendan.d.gregg@gmail.com>
>     Acked-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>

yep :)
hopefully Brendan can give it another spin.