From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Joerg Roedel Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Introduce per-domain page sizes Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 17:50:10 +0200 Message-ID: <20160509155010.GE13971@8bytes.org> References: <20160509112138.GB13275@8bytes.org> <57307863.1070706@arm.com> <20160509145157.GD13971@8bytes.org> <5730AA4F.4040303@arm.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <5730AA4F.4040303@arm.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: "linux-arm-kernel" Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org To: Robin Murphy Cc: laurent.pinchart+renesas@ideasonboard.com, will.deacon@arm.com, dianders@chromium.org, iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org, treding@nvidia.com, brian.starkey@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 04:18:39PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > Bah, I saw last week's "Merge remote-tracking branch > 'will/for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates' into HEAD" commit on that branch > without spotting it was no longer up to date, sorry. Yes, it's > probably safest if I rebase on top of your merge of everything else > - I'll keep an eye out. My tree is pushed now, you can rebase this one patch on the core branch and resend. Thanks, Joerg From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: joro@8bytes.org (Joerg Roedel) Date: Mon, 9 May 2016 17:50:10 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 0/5] Introduce per-domain page sizes In-Reply-To: <5730AA4F.4040303@arm.com> References: <20160509112138.GB13275@8bytes.org> <57307863.1070706@arm.com> <20160509145157.GD13971@8bytes.org> <5730AA4F.4040303@arm.com> Message-ID: <20160509155010.GE13971@8bytes.org> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Mon, May 09, 2016 at 04:18:39PM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > Bah, I saw last week's "Merge remote-tracking branch > 'will/for-joerg/arm-smmu/updates' into HEAD" commit on that branch > without spotting it was no longer up to date, sorry. Yes, it's > probably safest if I rebase on top of your merge of everything else > - I'll keep an eye out. My tree is pushed now, you can rebase this one patch on the core branch and resend. Thanks, Joerg