From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:56676 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753225AbcEPJfa (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 May 2016 05:35:30 -0400 Date: Mon, 16 May 2016 11:35:25 +0200 From: Jan Kara To: Theodore Ts'o Cc: Jan Kara , linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvdimm@ml01.01.org, Vishal Verma , Ross Zwisler , Dan Williams , linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] ext4: DAX fixes Message-ID: <20160516093525.GD12026@quack2.suse.cz> References: <1462959551-28622-1-git-send-email-jack@suse.cz> <20160513052419.GD5862@thunk.org> <20160513135600.GA2996@thunk.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20160513135600.GA2996@thunk.org> Sender: linux-fsdevel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Fri 13-05-16 09:56:00, Ted Tso wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 01:24:19AM -0400, Theodore Ts'o wrote: > > Queued and I'm running tests before I push them out. The patches > > passed the smoke tests[1], and the full tests should be running for the > > next seven hours or so at: http://104.197.222.91 > > So the good news is that the full tests ("gce-xfstests full") look > really good[1]) Unfortunately the DAX tests ("gce-xfstests -c dax -g > auto") show a regression. Is this expected? (i.e., were you > expecting test regressions that will be fixed by the DAX patch > series?) No, I was not expecting to get new xfstests failures from just ext4 patches. That being said I didn't test ext4 patches on their own, just in combination with other DAX changes so there may be some interaction I forgot about. I'll see whether I can reproduce the failures and understand what's going on. Thanks for having a look! Honza > Before this patch series: > > BEGIN TEST dax: Ext4 4k block using DAX Fri May 13 08:01:57 EDT 2016 > Failures: generic/250 generic/252 generic/299 generic/338 > > After the patch series: > > CMDLINE: -c dax -g auto > FSTESTVER: e2fsprogs v1.43-WIP-2015-05-18-64-g2334bd3 (Sat, 5 Sep 2015 22:21:35 -0400) > FSTESTVER: fio fio-2.6-8-ge6989e1 (Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:09:48 -0700) > FSTESTVER: quota 67fd9cc (Mon, 4 Apr 2016 00:32:39 -0400) > FSTESTVER: xfsprogs v4.3.0 (Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:24:24 +1100) > FSTESTVER: xfstests-bld ccae8d1 (Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:42:18 -0400) > FSTESTVER: xfstests linux-v3.8-1010-g97dd2d8 (Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:04:44 -0400) > FSTESTVER: kernel 4.6.0-rc4-ext4-00022-gaacd0c8 #282 SMP Fri May 13 00:52:07 EDT 2016 x86_64 > FSTESTCFG: "dax" > FSTESTSET: "-g auto" > FSTESTEXC: "" > FSTESTOPT: "aex" > MNTOPTS: "" > CPUS: "4" > MEM: "13052.8" > MEM: 26 GB (Max capacity) > BEGIN TEST dax: Ext4 4k block using DAX Fri May 13 01:21:58 EDT 2016 > Failures: generic/075 generic/091 generic/112 generic/127 generic/231 generic/250 generic/252 generic/263 generic/299 generic/338 generic/340 > > - Ted > > [1] CMDLINE: full > FSTESTVER: e2fsprogs v1.43-WIP-2015-05-18-64-g2334bd3 (Sat, 5 Sep 2015 22:21:35 -0400) > FSTESTVER: fio fio-2.6-8-ge6989e1 (Thu, 4 Feb 2016 12:09:48 -0700) > FSTESTVER: quota 67fd9cc (Mon, 4 Apr 2016 00:32:39 -0400) > FSTESTVER: xfsprogs v4.3.0 (Mon, 23 Nov 2015 15:24:24 +1100) > FSTESTVER: xfstests-bld ccae8d1 (Tue, 26 Apr 2016 00:42:18 -0400) > FSTESTVER: xfstests linux-v3.8-1010-g97dd2d8 (Wed, 27 Apr 2016 00:04:44 -0400) > FSTESTVER: kernel 4.6.0-rc4-ext4-00018-g816cd71 #279 SMP Thu May 5 22:45:36 EDT 2016 x86_64 > FSTESTCFG: "4k 1k ext3 encrypt nojournal ext3conv adv dioread_nolock data_journal bigalloc bigalloc_1k" > FSTESTSET: "-g auto" > FSTESTEXC: "" > FSTESTOPT: "aex" > MNTOPTS: "" > CPUS: "2" > MEM: "7497.07" > MEM: 7680 MB (Max capacity) > BEGIN TEST 4k: Ext4 4k block Thu May 5 22:52:10 EDT 2016 > Passed all 212 tests > BEGIN TEST 1k: Ext4 1k block Thu May 5 23:38:50 EDT 2016 > Failures: generic/018 > BEGIN TEST ext3: Ext4 4k block emulating ext3 Fri May 6 00:30:11 EDT 2016 > Passed all 167 tests > BEGIN TEST encrypt: Ext4 encryption Fri May 6 01:15:41 EDT 2016 > Failures: ext4/020 > BEGIN TEST nojournal: Ext4 4k block w/ no journal Fri May 6 01:40:25 EDT 2016 > Failures: ext4/301 > BEGIN TEST ext3conv: Ext4 4k block w/nodelalloc and no flex_bg Fri May 6 02:20:39 EDT 2016 > Passed all 212 tests > BEGIN TEST adv: Ext4 advanced features (inline_data, metadata_csum, 64bit) Fri May 6 03:06:25 EDT 2016 > Passed all 211 tests > BEGIN TEST dioread_nolock: Ext4 4k block w/dioread_nolock Fri May 6 03:53:34 EDT 2016 > Passed all 212 tests > BEGIN TEST data_journal: Ext4 4k block w/data=journal Fri May 6 04:40:52 EDT 2016 > Failures: ext4/271 generic/018 > BEGIN TEST bigalloc: Ext4 4k block w/bigalloc Fri May 6 05:28:12 EDT 2016 > Failures: ext4/004 generic/204 generic/219 generic/235 generic/273 > BEGIN TEST bigalloc_1k: Ext4 1k block w/bigalloc Fri May 6 06:18:54 EDT 2016 > Failures: ext4/004 generic/204 generic/235 generic/270 -- Jan Kara SUSE Labs, CR