From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Maxime Ripard Subject: Re: [PATCH 06/20] drm/sun4i: allow dclk to modify its parent rate Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 14:01:56 +0200 Message-ID: <20160525120156.GA9232@lukather> References: <1463402840-17062-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1463402840-17062-7-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="SUOF0GtieIMvvwua" Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-clk-owner@vger.kernel.org To: Chen-Yu Tsai Cc: Rob Herring , Mike Turquette , Stephen Boyd , Daniel Vetter , David Airlie , Boris Brezillon , Laurent Pinchart , dri-devel , linux-arm-kernel , devicetree , linux-clk List-Id: devicetree@vger.kernel.org --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 01:18:44AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > Hi, >=20 > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > The pixel clock being only a divider of its parent clock, depending on = the > > resolution, it's expected to change its parent rate. Add that flag so t= hat > > the clock framework knows it. >=20 > This should be squashed into the previous patch. Otherwise, the previous = one > doesn't really fix things, and probably makes things worse as it assumes = the > parent clock would be changed. Merged the two patches and applied, thanks! Maxime --=20 Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJXRZQ0AAoJEBx+YmzsjxAg19EP/A3wXTN8exzOUJG/1v9+Agx6 0ji5nVu8j7VAyWq700vA+6ftaEzFkhNU0/GnP11gkC0DMI6GXMSCGxZmErYSW/PU gsnE+muMicHvXVjcyEqth6b2281VphetBHa8MYo/Mg41rZZY3M0AZRA0uqQiSYSZ vkztquzRqlHoCbnVZ5xvEPgH9kx1XXRf3PNdYM0/YIazvpcf2Sc/Vy1JsUdWwPWm SiQi8sZ6HLN6QgxnridctLD1sHLfZu/cDVt4MdxNSFoMktPm6Brt9+DTRldLFJ0Q I538QtMDKc8mBmnc8YuqOXDhSLpTCvJA5wF3qfqabW+s/XoxrWXO8Y4RxpAuLWBC 5rje/xUTsDVWhfknWgWo5oT2Lg0FxEZZZEEJMdmiO8oWTv7N8l/DuW9lYddgwYVe Bxh7EJfYPZjhvxeiLqBpitPkcXXFIQJn+wQ2BlRtKsBKn1oj/mXjHnk+DRqsLLlU KWVIdKQlC64Itul50iwZFkzdeQI/1/oqiHR9DvgVaOsZgyOqEvdnIPF+hnT6qEkg SkNg/EgWSK7oMHa4g3Hlu3g7fEbN5g2ww5mgvsscbyc4hxs2r0tks+q9ORl2XRGp VNOzIuuqBb5/Fn34mYJtTm+2+4mGEOqpqx46KZA+T1JovnTZqjaHv26HWyFyEIXn cmd+Ls+3X4tVyY0zRnAN =QByE -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --SUOF0GtieIMvvwua-- From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com (Maxime Ripard) Date: Wed, 25 May 2016 14:01:56 +0200 Subject: [PATCH 06/20] drm/sun4i: allow dclk to modify its parent rate In-Reply-To: References: <1463402840-17062-1-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> <1463402840-17062-7-git-send-email-maxime.ripard@free-electrons.com> Message-ID: <20160525120156.GA9232@lukather> To: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org List-Id: linux-arm-kernel.lists.infradead.org On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 01:18:44AM +0800, Chen-Yu Tsai wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, May 16, 2016 at 8:47 PM, Maxime Ripard > wrote: > > The pixel clock being only a divider of its parent clock, depending on the > > resolution, it's expected to change its parent rate. Add that flag so that > > the clock framework knows it. > > This should be squashed into the previous patch. Otherwise, the previous one > doesn't really fix things, and probably makes things worse as it assumes the > parent clock would be changed. Merged the two patches and applied, thanks! Maxime -- Maxime Ripard, Free Electrons Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering http://free-electrons.com -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 819 bytes Desc: not available URL: